San Diego, CA - San Diego, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Brandon J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 14% |
| 2 | NGUYEN Nish | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 5% | |
| 3 | KUMBLA Samarth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
| 3 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
| 5 | YU Anders | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
| 6 | NAGIMOV Marsel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
| 7 | HONDA Kazu Z. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 8 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 15% |
| 9 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 23% | |
| 10 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 57% | 20% | 3% | |
| 11 | PARK Luke J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
| 12 | BANERJEE ANUP | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 13% | |
| 13 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | |
| 14 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 15 | BURKE Spencer W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 45% | 10% |
| 16 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 8% |
| 17 | WANG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 18 | WONG Nicholas A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 19 | MUSHER Benjamin J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | 10% | |
| 20 | PIESNER Joshua C. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 21 | DARIANO Noah G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 22% |
| 22 | ZHANG Luke T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 13% | |
| 23 | PROUTY Nicholas C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% | |
| 24 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 64% | |
| 25 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 8% |
| 26 | LAI Christopher W. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 26 | MORALES Ian N. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 28 | YAKUSHKIN Ernest D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 31% |
| 29 | SOMERS Sean | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 30 | GOOR Julian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 5% |
| 31 | XIAO EDWARD | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 3% | |
| 32 | JEON Caleb A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 13% |
| 33 | LEVY Jacob M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 44% |
| 34 | KIM Jackson | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 24% | 4% |
| 35 | STRUGAR Marcus A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
| 36 | LO Conrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% | |
| 37 | VARGAS Bryan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 38 | NG Eben S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 12% |
| 39 | DIERKS Kian | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 40 | CHEN Wilson | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 41 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 42 | CHEN Bryce | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 2% |
| 43 | VAZQUEZ Zander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 7% | |
| 44 | LI Ryan Z. | 100% | 76% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
| 45 | CHUNG Jinwoo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 42% | 7% | |
| 46 | OH Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 8% |
| 47 | ZHOU Oscar J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 47 | LEE David Y. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 49 | JEAN Noe T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 50 | MASCARI DUMONT Louis | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 51 | MASCARI DUMONT Alexandre | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 52 | LAKE Wyatt J. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 53 | CHUANG Kian J. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 54 | PAI Lakshan K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 55 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
| 56 | MU Jeffrey | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 57 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 100% | 55% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 58 | WOO Christian | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | 5% | - | |
| 59 | KIM BANSEOK | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 60 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 61 | PIESNER Zachary C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
| 62 | BAO Aaron | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 63 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 64 | HOU Kenneth | 100% | 89% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 65 | ANTON Nathaniel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 66 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
| 67 | WONG Luke S. | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 68 | TAN Christien | 100% | 94% | 65% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 69 | MO Jason | 100% | 92% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 70 | CHENG Matthew S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 71 | BAEK David | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
| 71 | KHER Roan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 73 | WONG Antonio | 100% | 92% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 74 | RYOU Aiden | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 75 | LI Peihong | 100% | 71% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 76 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 99% | 80% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 77 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 93% | 61% | 19% | 1% | - | |
| 78 | KIM Derek A. | 100% | 91% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 79 | MA Andrew | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 7% | 1% | |
| 80 | BERK Theodore | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 14% | |
| 81 | AIBEL Hudson J. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 2% | |
| 82 | FINNEY Lorenz | 100% | 95% | 70% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 83 | HUANG Kevin D. | 100% | 84% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 84 | NAM Michael | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 85 | ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) | 100% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 86 | CHEN Christopher | 100% | 73% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 87 | DETERING Julian | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 88 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 88 | WONG Matthew H. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 90 | CHEN Jaden K. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 91 | MA Bryant | 100% | 90% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 91 | HARRIS Rhonen | 100% | 82% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 93 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 79% | 35% | 7% | - | - | |
| 94 | OH Joshua | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 95 | BARTELS Milo | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 97 | OH Jaden | 100% | 89% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 98 | ZUO Ethan | 100% | 56% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 99 | ZENG Chuyi | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 99 | BLADH Ian | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.