San Diego SYC

Y-14 Men's Foil

Saturday, December 8, 2018 at 8:00 AM

San Diego, CA - San Diego, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 KIM Brandon J. - - 3% 15% 33% 35% 14%
2 NGUYEN Nish - 4% 20% 40% 31% 5%
3 KUMBLA Samarth - - - 4% 19% 42% 35%
3 HOOSHI Dylan M. - - - 3% 17% 43% 38%
5 YU Anders - - 3% 14% 32% 35% 15%
6 NAGIMOV Marsel - - - 1% 9% 38% 52%
7 HONDA Kazu Z. - 1% 9% 27% 37% 21% 4%
8 FUKUDA Renzo K. - - 4% 15% 32% 34% 15%
9 GIRALDO Pablo E. - - 1% 14% 62% 23%
10 CHIN Julian S. - 9% 33% 38% 17% 3%
11 PARK Luke J. - - 1% 6% 24% 42% 27%
12 BANERJEE ANUP - 1% 12% 35% 39% 13%
13 JAIN Aditya - - 1% 9% 36% 54%
14 SUNG Chang-Han S. - 5% 19% 33% 29% 12% 2%
15 BURKE Spencer W. - - 3% 15% 36% 36% 10%
16 HOOSHI Jayden C. - - 4% 19% 38% 31% 8%
17 WANG Andrew - 5% 19% 34% 29% 12% 2%
18 WONG Nicholas A. - 2% 12% 29% 34% 19% 4%
19 MUSHER Benjamin J. - 1% 11% 37% 41% 10%
20 PIESNER Joshua C. 1% 9% 26% 34% 22% 7% 1%
21 DARIANO Noah G. - - 2% 9% 28% 39% 22%
22 ZHANG Luke T. - 2% 11% 34% 41% 13%
23 PROUTY Nicholas C. - - 1% 9% 39% 51%
24 LI Richard - - - 3% 33% 64%
25 TSAY Jeremy M. - - 3% 17% 38% 33% 8%
26 LAI Christopher W. 1% 8% 33% 37% 18% 4% -
26 MORALES Ian N. - 2% 15% 33% 33% 14% 2%
28 YAKUSHKIN Ernest D. - - 1% 6% 22% 41% 31%
29 SOMERS Sean 2% 12% 30% 34% 18% 4% -
30 GOOR Julian - 2% 10% 28% 35% 21% 5%
31 XIAO EDWARD 1% 10% 30% 38% 19% 3%
32 JEON Caleb A. - - 3% 15% 34% 35% 13%
33 LEVY Jacob M. - - - 3% 14% 39% 44%
34 KIM Jackson - 3% 13% 28% 33% 19% 4%
35 STRUGAR Marcus A. - 1% 7% 24% 37% 25% 6%
36 LO Conrad - - 3% 16% 42% 39%
37 VARGAS Bryan 1% 10% 26% 33% 22% 7% 1%
38 NG Eben S. - - 2% 13% 34% 39% 12%
39 DIERKS Kian - 5% 21% 35% 27% 10% 1%
40 CHEN Wilson 2% 14% 34% 33% 14% 2% -
41 GOLDADE Luke A. 8% 28% 35% 21% 7% 1% -
42 CHEN Bryce - 2% 13% 36% 34% 13% 2%
43 VAZQUEZ Zander - 3% 18% 39% 33% 7%
44 LI Ryan Z. 24% 46% 26% 5% - -
45 CHUNG Jinwoo - 1% 12% 44% 35% 7%
46 OH Jonathan - - 4% 18% 38% 33% 8%
47 ZHOU Oscar J. - 3% 17% 35% 32% 11% 1%
47 LEE David Y. 7% 25% 35% 23% 8% 1% -
49 JEAN Noe T. - 3% 14% 32% 35% 15% 2%
50 MASCARI DUMONT Louis 2% 14% 34% 33% 14% 2% -
51 MASCARI DUMONT Alexandre 5% 25% 38% 24% 7% 1% -
52 LAKE Wyatt J. 1% 12% 29% 33% 19% 5% 1%
53 CHUANG Kian J. 4% 21% 36% 27% 10% 1% -
54 PAI Lakshan K. - 4% 15% 31% 32% 15% 2%
55 LUH Ethan K. 1% 5% 18% 32% 29% 13% 2%
56 MU Jeffrey 30% 43% 22% 5% - -
57 HOBSON Aaron K. 45% 41% 12% 1% - -
58 WOO Christian 2% 16% 41% 36% 5% -
59 KIM BANSEOK 4% 21% 38% 28% 8% 1%
60 SADOVSKY Leor B. 1% 9% 29% 35% 20% 5% 1%
61 PIESNER Zachary C. - 2% 11% 27% 34% 20% 5%
62 BAO Aaron 1% 6% 22% 35% 26% 9% 1%
63 ZHAI Jeffrey 2% 14% 31% 32% 16% 4% -
64 HOU Kenneth 11% 40% 38% 10% 1% -
65 ANTON Nathaniel - 4% 19% 36% 30% 10% 1%
66 CHIRASHNYA Adam - 2% 11% 27% 34% 21% 5%
67 WONG Luke S. 10% 34% 37% 16% 3% -
68 TAN Christien 6% 29% 40% 21% 4% -
69 MO Jason 8% 39% 36% 14% 2% -
70 CHENG Matthew S. - 4% 17% 33% 31% 13% 2%
71 BAEK David - 3% 14% 32% 33% 16% 3%
71 KHER Roan 2% 13% 32% 34% 16% 3% -
73 WONG Antonio 8% 30% 37% 20% 5% 1% -
74 RYOU Aiden 36% 43% 18% 3% - - -
75 LI Peihong 29% 41% 23% 6% 1% - -
76 WANG Ethan 1% 19% 36% 29% 12% 2% -
77 LLIDO Soren 7% 32% 42% 18% 1% -
78 KIM Derek A. 9% 39% 40% 11% 1% -
79 MA Andrew 4% 22% 40% 27% 7% 1%
80 BERK Theodore - 2% 12% 34% 39% 14%
81 AIBEL Hudson J. 2% 15% 35% 33% 13% 2%
82 FINNEY Lorenz 5% 24% 36% 24% 8% 1% -
83 HUANG Kevin D. 16% 36% 31% 13% 3% - -
84 NAM Michael 48% 39% 12% 2% - - -
85 ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) 42% 43% 13% 2% - - -
86 CHEN Christopher 27% 49% 20% 4% - - -
87 DETERING Julian 2% 12% 28% 33% 19% 5% 1%
88 CORTRIGHT Joshua C. 3% 14% 30% 32% 17% 4% -
88 WONG Matthew H. 4% 23% 39% 26% 8% 1% -
90 CHEN Jaden K. 1% 11% 31% 36% 17% 3% -
91 MA Bryant 10% 37% 36% 15% 2% - -
91 HARRIS Rhonen 18% 45% 29% 7% 1% - -
93 HOSKERI Anik S. 21% 43% 29% 6% - -
94 OH Joshua 46% 40% 13% 2% - -
95 BARTELS Milo 63% 32% 5% - - -
97 OH Jaden 11% 31% 34% 19% 5% 1% -
98 ZUO Ethan 44% 46% 10% 1% - - -
99 ZENG Chuyi 31% 42% 21% 5% 1% - -
99 BLADH Ian 21% 42% 28% 8% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.