Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | GALLANT Antoine | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 2 | BHATNAGAR Ayan | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 3 | RICHARD Owen | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 3 | WU Joseph | V V V D V D | V V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 5 | BORODITSKY Ethan | V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 6 | KOKENGE Reid | V V V D V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 7 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | V V V V D | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 8 | WIECHMANN Colin | V D D V V | V V V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 9 | PRIHODKO Max | V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 10 | KATS Dylan G. | V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 11 | SKAALAND Will | V V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 12 | MISHIMA Torata | D V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 13 | LEVCHOOK Thomas | D V V V V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 14 | KNOX James | D D V V V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 15 | KIM Byung | D D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 16 | CHERPELIS George | V V V D D | V V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 17 | NORTON Theo B. | D V V D V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 18 | LI Jalen | V V D D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 19 | THAKUR Om S. | V D V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 20 | KUMAR Aidan | V V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 21 | PARK Nicholas | D D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 22 | SHCHUR Landon | V V D V D D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 23 | NOVOJILOV Alexei | V V V D D D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 24 | BHATIA Arav | D D D V V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 25 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | D V D V D | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 26 | ALKEMA Benjamin | V V D D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 27 | NESTERCZUK Maddox W. | D V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 28 | JOSLIN Tyler | D D V V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 29 | TAHOUN Aly | D D D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 30 | KOMPELLA Sriram | D D D V D | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 31 | XIE Brandon | D D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 32 | TAYLOR JASPER E. | D D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 33 | WU Jonathan | V D D V V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 34 | BHATIA Rahil | D V V D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 35 | AMELOT Alexander | D D D V V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 36 | NASRIDDINOV Ardasher | V V D D D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 37 | KUBATIN Anton V. | V D D V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 38 | LAI Aiden | D D V V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 39 | RAKOWSKY Luke | V V D D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 40 | TIRADO Giancarlo | D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 41 | GU Aidan | D D V D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 42 | KALKANIS George | V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 43 | LEE Isaac | D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 44 | MCGREEVY Alexander P. | D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 45 | PATTERSON Jack | V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 46 | SOSNICK Samuel | D D D D D V | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 47 | DURKIN Tristan E. | D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
| 48 | DOWD Peter L. | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 49 | RIPA Joseph K. | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.