Jersey City, NJ - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LOYOLA TORRIENTE Padick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
| 2 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 16% | |
| 3 | WU Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 36% | |
| 3 | JIN Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 15% |
| 5 | KIM Byung | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 6 | INSLER Ethan C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% | |
| 7 | WANG Eric S | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 13% | 1% | |
| 8 | KUMAR Aidan | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 9 | JIN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 29% | |
| 10 | KIM Juni C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 64% |
| 11 | CHEN Eric | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | |
| 12 | KIM Tei D. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 6% | |
| 13 | AGAON Shawn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 17% | |
| 14 | LEHR William D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
| 15 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 65% | 20% | 2% | |
| 16 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 17 | BHATNAGAR Ayan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 18 | WANG Darren | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 19 | ROLLO Emmett H. | 100% | 96% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 20 | SHEN Max | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 3% |
| 21 | NOVOJILOV Alexei | 100% | 100% | 96% | 62% | 17% | 2% | |
| 22 | CHEN Jun Ho | 100% | 87% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 23 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 24 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 25 | LEE Hudson | 100% | 100% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 26 | AGAON Ethan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 6% | |
| 27 | MORTON William | 100% | 100% | 92% | 63% | 20% | 2% | |
| 28 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 29 | LANGTON Sawyer | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 9% | |
| 30 | HERMANSON David B. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 1% |
| 31 | LI Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 32 | WEI Jonny | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | LEE Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 28% | |
| 34 | LI Jalen | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 35 | TEH Steven | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 36 | DISIMONE David Z. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 5% | |
| 37 | MOTIR Lucas D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 33% | |
| 38 | ARAVIND Athreya | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 39 | SAKO Ayrton I. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 40 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 41 | FENG du | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 42 | XIA Oliver | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | PYO Michael M. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
| 44 | BHATT Krish | 100% | 64% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 45 | BYARS John | 100% | 42% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 46 | GONG Haixiang | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | 100% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 48 | YU Hunter | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 49 | FERRARA Milo | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 11% | 1% | |
| 50 | WANG Max S | 100% | 55% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 51 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 52 | GUI Runlin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
| 53 | YAGNIK Yash | 100% | 74% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 54 | DESTEFANO Domenic | 100% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | UPSHAW Micah | 100% | 95% | 68% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 56 | FALBERG Andrew | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 57 | KALKANIS George | 100% | 69% | 10% | - | - | - | |
| 58 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.