Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | THEIN-SANDLER Adrien (Adi) M. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% |
| 2 | CALDERON Diego | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 7% |
| 3 | ELASHRY Zeyad A. | - | - | < 1% | 2% | 12% | 38% | 48% |
| 3 | MATTIS George | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
| 5 | GRAYSON Shane W. | - | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 6 | TAYLOR Daryl J. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
| 7 | HE Lawrence | 1% | 7% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 8 | CUMMINGS Atticus C. | - | - | < 1% | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% |
| 9 | WU Joseph | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 31% |
| 10 | KIM Benjamin I. | 1% | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | |
| 11 | MOSES Alexander | - | - | 5% | 22% | 42% | 26% | 5% |
| 12 | PARK Elliot | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% | - |
| 13 | ZHUANG William | 17% | 41% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 14 | WANG Nathan | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
| 15 | GAINES Aaron | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 16 | WONG Daniel | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 17 | TSANG Lok Hin Gary | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 38% |
| 18 | NORBUTAS Jackson S. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 18% |
| 19 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 42% | 25% |
| 20 | FIECHTNER Thomas A. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 9% |
| 21 | MA Victor | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 22 | MANDOKI Sandor I. | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
| 23 | AHN Gus | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 2% |
| 24 | JIN Alexander | - | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 4% |
| 25 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | 2% | 14% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 26 | CARTER Austin L. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% |
| 27 | GREEN Jabreel | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 28 | ZHU Max | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 6% | |
| 29 | RITCHIE Phillip | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 30 | CHIEN Brandon | - | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 45% | 15% |
| 31 | CHIEN Zachary M. | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | |
| 32 | BURCHARD Byron M. | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 41% | 19% | 2% |
| 33 | JEON Alexander E. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% | |
| 34 | FOWLER James A. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
| 35 | JOHNSTON Conner S. | - | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 36 | CHU Allan | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 37 | USHER Alexander | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 38 | WANG DEVON | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 39 | LIN Kyran | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% | |
| 40 | CAI Brian | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 19% | |
| 41 | POLAKOSKI David R. | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% | |
| 42 | ZHENG Haoran | - | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 43 | GAO Daniel | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 44 | LIANG Aaron | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 45 | ALEXANDER Chuck | - | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 46 | WERCHAN Andrew R. | 1% | 14% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 47 | GAO Chaney C. | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | GOMEZ Isaac | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
| 48 | WATT Darren | 27% | 47% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 50 | WEAVER Neil | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 51 | HIGGINS Branford | 2% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 52 | KILUK Andrew | 4% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 53 | LEVITSKY Jonathan | - | 7% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 54 | LEE Joseph J. | 5% | 40% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | WONG Nathan | - | 9% | 34% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 56 | JIN daniel | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 57 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 58 | MOHEBI Saam | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 59 | SHA Michael | 40% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 60 | LOCASALE Nicholas A. | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 61 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 62 | HARRIS Roark S. | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 63 | LEE Richard U. | 12% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 64 | LEE Chun Po | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 65 | GAURIAT Olivier | 4% | 45% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 66 | YOUNG Jr Colby | 23% | 47% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 67 | WANG owen | 9% | 34% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 68 | RINGACH Noam | 6% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 69 | ANDERSON Donald | 86% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 70 | WIEGAND-SHAHANI Braden M. | 26% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 71 | CHUANG Kenneth H. | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 72 | GU Aidan | 63% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 73 | CUEVAS Tom | 25% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | MIAO KUNQI | 79% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 75 | LIU Yikun | 58% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.