Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | THEIN-SANDLER Adrien (Adi) M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% |
2 | CALDERON Diego | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 7% |
3 | ELASHRY Zeyad A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
3 | MATTIS George | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
5 | GRAYSON Shane W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
6 | TAYLOR Daryl J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
7 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
8 | CUMMINGS Atticus C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% |
9 | WU Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 31% |
10 | KIM Benjamin I. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | |
11 | MOSES Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 31% | 5% |
12 | PARK Elliot | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 9% | - |
13 | ZHUANG William | 100% | 83% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
14 | WANG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
15 | GAINES Aaron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 2% |
16 | WONG Daniel | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
17 | TSANG Lok Hin Gary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
18 | NORBUTAS Jackson S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% |
19 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 25% |
20 | FIECHTNER Thomas A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 70% | 36% | 9% |
21 | MA Victor | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
22 | MANDOKI Sandor I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
23 | AHN Gus | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 21% | 2% |
24 | JIN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 34% | 4% |
25 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
26 | CARTER Austin L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% |
27 | GREEN Jabreel | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
28 | ZHU Max | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 6% | |
29 | RITCHIE Phillip | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
30 | CHIEN Brandon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 15% |
31 | CHIEN Zachary M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 9% | |
32 | BURCHARD Byron M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 21% | 2% |
33 | JEON Alexander E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | |
34 | FOWLER James A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% |
35 | JOHNSTON Conner S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% |
36 | CHU Allan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
37 | USHER Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
38 | WANG DEVON | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
39 | LIN Kyran | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% | |
40 | CAI Brian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% | |
41 | POLAKOSKI David R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 11% | |
42 | ZHENG Haoran | 100% | 100% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - |
43 | GAO Daniel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
44 | LIANG Aaron | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
45 | ALEXANDER Chuck | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
46 | WERCHAN Andrew R. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - |
47 | GAO Chaney C. | 100% | 78% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
48 | GOMEZ Isaac | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
48 | WATT Darren | 100% | 73% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
50 | WEAVER Neil | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
51 | HIGGINS Branford | 100% | 98% | 77% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
52 | KILUK Andrew | 100% | 96% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - | |
53 | LEVITSKY Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - |
54 | LEE Joseph J. | 100% | 95% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
55 | WONG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 91% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - |
56 | JIN daniel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
57 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
58 | MOHEBI Saam | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
59 | SHA Michael | 100% | 60% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
60 | LOCASALE Nicholas A. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
61 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
62 | HARRIS Roark S. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
63 | LEE Richard U. | 100% | 88% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
64 | LEE Chun Po | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
65 | GAURIAT Olivier | 100% | 96% | 51% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
66 | YOUNG Jr Colby | 100% | 77% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
67 | WANG owen | 100% | 91% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
68 | RINGACH Noam | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
69 | ANDERSON Donald | 100% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
70 | WIEGAND-SHAHANI Braden M. | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
71 | CHUANG Kenneth H. | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
72 | GU Aidan | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | |
73 | CUEVAS Tom | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
74 | MIAO KUNQI | 100% | 21% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
75 | LIU Yikun | 100% | 42% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.