King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | WU Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% |
| 2 | BEZRODNOV Michael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% |
| 3 | ZHAO Luhan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
| 3 | GAO Daniel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 5 | JIN Owen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 26% |
| 6 | BINDAS Odinn A. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 5% |
| 7 | MORSE Tyler | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
| 8 | PARK Brian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 12% |
| 9 | LOYOLA TORRIENTE Padick | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
| 10 | DUAN eric | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 11 | KOKENGE Reid | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
| 12 | ZHANG William | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 13 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 14 | CHEN Eric | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% |
| 15 | CAO Brad | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
| 16 | SINGH Aryaman | 100% | 92% | 54% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 17 | ROYTBURD Samuel | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 18 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
| 19 | USDIN Anton | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 16% | 2% |
| 19 | CAO Albert | 100% | 99% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 21 | WU Marcus | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
| 21 | BEZRODNOV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 35% |
| 23 | BORODITSKY Ethan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 8% |
| 24 | WIECHMANN Colin | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 25 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
| 26 | KUMAR Aidan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 3% |
| 27 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 28 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | 100% | 100% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 3% |
| 29 | KARAMANIAN Nicholas | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 29 | MAHESH Tarun | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 31 | LAI Aiden | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 32 | JORDAN Anton | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 33 | KNOX James | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 34 | SCYPINSKI Andrew | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 35 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 35 | CHEN Jun Ho | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 37 | TAHOUN Aly | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 38 | WOLFSOHN Peleg | 100% | 91% | 55% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 39 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | ZIAEE Armin | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | SHULKIN Mark | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 42 | FENG du | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.