New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WU Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% |
2 | COLLYMORE Spencer T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
3 | GOHEL Dayus T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% |
3 | AGAON Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 17% | 2% |
5 | CHEN Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 8% |
6 | FELDMAN Jaemin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
7 | LIEF Isaac R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% | |
8 | CHOI Aleksey | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
9 | ZENG Zihan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% | 8% | |
10 | BEZRODNOV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 13% |
11 | GAO Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 19% | |
12 | MACARTY Jordan T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 6% |
13 | KUDRIAVTCEV Sergei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% |
14 | JOSLIN Tyler | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% | - |
15 | AGAON Shawn | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
16 | LI Jalen | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
17 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% | |
18 | MISHIMA Torata | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 9% | |
19 | KOKENGE Reid | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% | |
20 | SKAALAND Will | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 22% | |
21 | SHAH Maximilian A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | |
22 | BORODITSKY Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 15% |
23 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
24 | RICHARD Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 13% |
25 | EKE Frank | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% | |
26 | PRIHODKO Max | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 9% | |
27 | LAI Aedin | 100% | 99% | 85% | 47% | 12% | 1% | |
28 | ROLLO Emmett H. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
29 | KOBI Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 12% |
30 | YANG Edward | 100% | 99% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
31 | TUMIBAY Noah C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% | 14% | |
32 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 100% | 90% | 49% | 13% | 2% | - | |
33 | LEE Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 45% | |
34 | TEH Steven | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
35 | CHEN Jun Ho | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 7% | - |
36 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 14% | 1% | |
37 | FUSSMAN Yuval | 100% | 77% | 32% | 5% | - | - | |
38 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 15% | 1% | |
39 | THAKUR Om S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
40 | GONG Haixiang | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% | - |
41 | LEE Hudson | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
42 | STABB Xuan | 100% | 99% | 81% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - |
43 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - |
44 | STEWART Charlie | 100% | 94% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - | |
45 | BEALS Alden | 100% | 96% | 69% | 28% | 5% | - | |
46 | BEZRODNOV Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% |
47 | KALKANIS George | 100% | 83% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
48 | OSTIGUY Cameron | 100% | 94% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
49 | BRODSKY Julian | 100% | 98% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
50 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
51 | SONG Troy | 100% | 84% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
52 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 80% | 32% | 6% | - | - | |
53 | SANTOS Antonio K. | 100% | 81% | 37% | 7% | - | - | |
54 | KUBATIN Anton V. | 100% | 92% | 51% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
55 | TANG WanLi | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
56 | LIU Jeremiah | 100% | 52% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
57 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - |
58 | CHOI Christian | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
58 | BYUN Kevin | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | |
60 | KIM Dylan | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
61 | MACNEILL Owen | 100% | 84% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | |
61 | BYARS John | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
61 | PANDALAI Aryan | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | |
64 | TEREB Daniel | 100% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
65 | MASSE Jack | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.