DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | NORTH Gary S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 15% |
2 | RHYU Kozmo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 27% | 3% |
3 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% |
3 | LEE Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% | |
5 | SU Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
6 | CHAWLA Armaan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 12% |
7 | KWOUN Miles S. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - |
8 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
9 | PARK Ian C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 24% |
10 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 25% | 4% | |
11 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% | 12% | - |
12 | KORFONTA Jolie | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 3% | - |
13 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
14 | AYMETT Robert (Skip) S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
15 | PARK Faith K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 25% |
16 | O'HARROW Tristan C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
17 | HRAPSKY Ryan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
18 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 5% | |
19 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
20 | LEE Samuel Y. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
21 | USDIN Anton | 100% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
22 | O'DOWD Andrew J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 22% | |
23 | MORGAN Elizabeth (Ella) R. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
24 | HUGHES Michael D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 31% | 5% |
25 | HARDY Tristan L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
26 | HOFFMANN Christopher J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 20% | 2% |
27 | GRUPP Tristan E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 10% | 1% |
28 | WANG Clayton | 100% | 97% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
29 | KUCZAJDA Matthew | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - |
30 | WANG Trontour | 100% | 64% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
31 | LU Samantha R. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
32 | LEE JoonWon | 100% | 86% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
33 | PENNER Kyle D. | 100% | 94% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
34 | LAM Bill | 100% | 88% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
35 | LAWSON Dylan | 100% | 86% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
36 | BEREZOVSKI Eugene | 100% | 85% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
37 | YU Eric | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
38 | ROTHKA Spencer J. | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
39 | ZHANG Caden | 100% | 73% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
40 | ZHANG Andy | 100% | 85% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
41 | LU Qi | 100% | 62% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.