King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WU Joseph | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 15% | |
| 2 | ZHAO corey | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 10% | |
| 3 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
| 3 | JIN Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% |
| 5 | JIN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | |
| 6 | GAO Daniel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 5% | |
| 7 | GOHEL Dayus T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 16% | |
| 8 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% | |
| 9 | KOKENGE Reid | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 10 | BEZRODNOV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
| 11 | KROPP Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | |
| 12 | FELDMAN Jaemin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% | |
| 13 | BEZRODNOV Michael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 5% |
| 14 | LOYOLA TORRIENTE Padick | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 21% | |
| 15 | LURVEY Samuel | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 16 | LEE Seungwon | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
| 17 | WIECHMANN Colin | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 2% | |
| 18 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 6% | |
| 19 | KIM Byung | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 14% | 2% | |
| 20 | CAO Albert | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 21 | SHIV Rishi | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% | |
| 22 | MISHIMA Torata | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
| 23 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% | |
| 24 | LI Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 8% | |
| 25 | ZHAO Luhan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 26 | JUN Jaywu | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
| 27 | TAHOUN Aly | 100% | 99% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 28 | NOVOJILOV Alexei | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 29 | BORODITSKY Ethan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 3% | |
| 30 | SHCHUR Landon | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 31 | POZOVSKIY Mitchell R. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 25% | 4% | |
| 32 | USDIN Anton | 100% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | DIXON Thomas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 34 | SERAFIN Ben | 100% | 80% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 4% | |
| 36 | MORSE Tyler | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 38% | 10% |
| 37 | MACARTY Jordan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 11% |
| 38 | PRIHODKO Max | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 39 | CHOI Mason | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 40 | BINDAS Odinn A. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
| 41 | DUAN eric | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 42 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 94% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 43 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | 100% | 97% | 72% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 44 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 45 | LIU Terry | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 46 | SAVORETTI Francesco | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | KUMAR Aidan | 100% | 97% | 71% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 48 | WOLFSOHN Peleg | 100% | 96% | 67% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 49 | STEVENS George | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 50 | XU Alexander | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 51 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 52 | LAI Aiden | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 53 | FENG du | 100% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 54 | MCCRACKEN Dylan | 100% | 95% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 55 | ARAVIND Athreya | 100% | 96% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 56 | GONG Haixiang | 100% | 60% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 57 | CHANG Benjamin | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.