Anaheim, CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CANDELA Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
| 2 | DAO Matthew M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% |
| 3 | JIN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 7% |
| 3 | NORBUTAS Jackson S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
| 5 | JEONG Connor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
| 6 | JEON Alexander E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% |
| 7 | EMARA Omar | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 8 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
| 9 | CAI Kevin P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 32% | |
| 10 | ROBINSON Riley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 29% | |
| 11 | WESTPHAL David R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 22% |
| 12 | DIEDERICHS Jimmy G. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 13 | LIN Kyran | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% | |
| 14 | DOLMETSCH Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
| 15 | SHARMA Sanil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 26% |
| 16 | MOHEBI Saam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 6% |
| 17 | LOGUE Ethan D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 18 | PARK Elliot | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 19 | TARBUSKOVICH III John | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 34% | 5% |
| 20 | WEAVER Neil | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 21 | AHN Gus | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 22 | KIM Benjamin I. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 6% | |
| 23 | WONG Nicholas A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 9% |
| 23 | COOPER Rowan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
| 25 | ZHANG Alec | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 26 | MOSES Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
| 27 | LEVY Zachari I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 15% |
| 28 | GRAYSON Shane W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 29 | LUCERO-OLSON Aydin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 30 | KOPPE Alexander | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 31 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 32 | USHER Alexander | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 33 | MA Victor | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | < 1% |
| 34 | DOAN Joseph M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
| 35 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
| 36 | GALLO James | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% | |
| 37 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% |
| 38 | LEE Matthew C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 39 | JIN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 40 | YUMIACO Nolan C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 41 | SINGHA Orion | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% |
| 42 | WESTON Tom | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | KIM Sterling S. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 44 | KIM Darius H. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 45 | LIN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% | |
| 46 | ZHU Max | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 12% | |
| 47 | PHUKAN Rohin | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 48 | HIGGINS Branford | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 49 | AU Marcus J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 3% |
| 50 | WANG DEVON | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 51 | STRAUSS Luke | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 52 | ZHOU Alec Q. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 6% | 1% |
| 53 | FERRIERE Joshua | 100% | 96% | 68% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 54 | LIANG Aaron | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 26% | 4% | |
| 55 | THOMPSON Chester | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 56 | WELLS Tommy R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
| 57 | DUONG Enoch | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 58 | WONG Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
| 59 | HOLDERNESS Landon | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 60 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 23% | 3% |
| 61 | JAIN Sarthak | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 62 | LEE Chun Po | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | MCDONALD Ethan | 100% | 92% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 64 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 65 | ULINICH Alexander | 100% | 67% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 66 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 67 | BHARGAV Siddharth | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 68 | HARR Carver | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 69 | PARK Augustine | 100% | 93% | 69% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 70 | ZHENG Haoran | 100% | 88% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 71 | BRUSKOTTER Reiland | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 72 | NGO Ethan | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 73 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | 100% | 96% | 69% | 30% | 6% | 1% | |
| 73 | EVANS noah | 100% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 75 | CHON Joshua | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 75 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 77 | SOOHOO Jackson F. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 78 | WATT Darren | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 79 | SHA Michael | 100% | 88% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 80 | WANG owen | 100% | 80% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 81 | STENNIS Brendan | 100% | 87% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 82 | BEAMS Yevgeny | 100% | 79% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 83 | GU Aidan | 100% | 81% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 84 | PAK Elliot | 100% | 46% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 85 | CHRISTENSEN Parker | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 86 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 87 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 100% | 68% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 88 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | 100% | 49% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.