Anaheim, CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NORBUTAS Jackson S. | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% | |
| 2 | ROBINSON Riley | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% |
| 3 | DAO Matthew M. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% |
| 3 | ZHANG Alec | 1% | 10% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 2% | |
| 5 | SHARMA Sanil | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 33% |
| 6 | MOSES Alexander | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% |
| 7 | HOLDERNESS Landon | 1% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
| 8 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 2% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 9 | LUCERO-OLSON Aydin | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% | |
| 10 | PHUKAN Rohin | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | < 1% | |
| 11 | LIN Ryan | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
| 12 | WONG Daniel | - | 6% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 3% | |
| 13 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% | |
| 14 | WONG Nicholas A. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 19% | |
| 15 | KIM Benjamin I. | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | |
| 16 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | 1% | 7% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 2% | |
| 17 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 22% | |
| 18 | LOGUE Ethan D. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 19 | AU Marcus J. | - | 7% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 3% | |
| 20 | WANG DEVON | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 21 | AHN Gus | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 22 | ZHU Max | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 24% | |
| 23 | JAIN Sarthak | 2% | 15% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 24 | KOPPE Alexander | 2% | 13% | 36% | 36% | 13% | 1% | |
| 25 | THOMPSON Chester | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | SINGHA Orion | - | - | 3% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 12% |
| 27 | JONES Caleb | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 28 | USHER Alexander | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 29 | COOPER Rowan | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 6% | |
| 30 | SOOHOO Jackson F. | 2% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 31 | JIN Daniel | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 4% | |
| 32 | MCDONALD Ethan | 18% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | LIN Kyran | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 44% | 22% | |
| 34 | STRAUSS Luke | - | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 34% | 4% |
| 35 | ULINICH Alexander | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | BRUSKOTTER Reiland | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 37 | FERRIERE Joshua | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 38 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 25% | |
| 39 | MOHEBI Saam | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 18% | |
| 40 | LIANG Aaron | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
| 41 | WEAVER Neil | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
| 42 | KIM Darius H. | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% | 1% |
| 43 | ZHENG Haoran | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 44 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 45 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | 14% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | QUITORIANO Jonathan | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | DUONG Enoch | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 5% |
| 48 | WESTON Tom | 12% | 43% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | PARK Elliot | 1% | 11% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | |
| 50 | EVANS noah | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 28% | 7% | - |
| 51 | KIM Nathan | 2% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 52 | LEE Chun Po | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | BHARGAV Siddharth | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 54 | HARR Carver | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 55 | BEAMS Yevgeny | 22% | 46% | 26% | 6% | - | - | |
| 56 | WANG owen | 40% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 57 | QUITORIANO Matthew | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | PAK Elliot | 69% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 59 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 60 | HIGGINS Branford | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 61 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 5% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 62 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | 8% | 44% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | NGO Ethan | 30% | 44% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
| 64 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 65 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 66 | GU Aidan | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 67 | WATT Darren | 44% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 68 | CHRISTENSEN Parker | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 69 | KIM Sullivan | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 70 | PARK Augustine | 16% | 46% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 71 | TOLBERT-SCHWARTZ Everett | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.