Myrtle Beach Convention Center, Hall A - Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JEYOON Ryan S. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
| 2 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 3 | CLICK Aiden | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 48% |
| 3 | KIM Donghyeok | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 62% |
| 5 | LEE Daniel Y. | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 66% | |
| 6 | WU Byron | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% | |
| 7 | LEE Samuel Y. | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% | |
| 8 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 12% | |
| 9 | TREBON Hayden | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% |
| 10 | XU Alex | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 42% | 18% |
| 11 | JAAFAR Omar | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 50% | 11% | |
| 12 | LEE Shwan | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 21% | |
| 13 | VALES Keyan | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 14 | HAN David | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 4% |
| 15 | RHYU Kozmo | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 44% | 37% |
| 16 | LEE JoonWon | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 17 | ARANA Abraham | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 7% |
| 18 | SINGH Aryaman | 6% | 39% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 19 | WANG Trontour | 2% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 20 | ILYAS Zakariya | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 21 | SPITTLE Jake | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 22 | LIN Harrison | 11% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 23 | GATZA Logan | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 21% | |
| 24 | LEONE III Charles D. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 41% | |
| 25 | NORMAN Christian | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 9% | |
| 26 | WOLFE Alex | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 27 | VACCARO Dominick J. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
| 28 | LEE JUNYOUNG | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 29 | JONES Tyler | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 30 | KIM Dylan J. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 5% |
| 31 | BERNARD Jack B. | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | MILLER Kurt | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 33 | FU Ethan | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 34 | SLOUGH Sean | - | 7% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 4% | |
| 35 | JEON Hwidong | 2% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 36 | SCHARF Ryan | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | ROTHKA Spencer J. | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 38 | MODULLA Yathin | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 39 | JACKSON James | - | 6% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 4% | |
| 40 | WANG Bryan | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
| 41 | CORLEY Avery | 12% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | CREMONA Diego Maria | 5% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 43 | DAVIS Jonah | 14% | 42% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | PARNAS Ely | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 45 | TRIMMER Colin | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
| 46 | RYEOM JIHOON | 13% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | SCHERNIKAU Jack | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 48 | GERBER Benjamin | 2% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 7% | - | |
| 49 | KIM Ryan | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 50 | COREY Colin | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | PASZKOWIAK Jacob | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 52 | KIM Taeho | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 53 | CHUNG Joshua | 12% | 38% | 37% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | SELLAR Ian | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 55 | REDDY Daksh | 48% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 56 | JAAFAR Hamza | 26% | 45% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | LE Kevin | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 58 | MCCOLLAM Isaac | 30% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 59 | MILLER Jonathan | 66% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.