Oaks, PA - Oaks, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | KIM Byung | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 2 | JOSEPH William | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
| 3 | WU Byron | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 3 | HE Lawrence | - | 2% | 21% | 45% | 29% | 4% |
| 5 | GARCIA-ROGERS Lucas H. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 53% |
| 6 | STEVENS Daniel | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 7 | NOVOJILOV Alexei | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 8 | WADE Grayson | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 9 | MISHIMA Torata | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 4% |
| 10 | SERAFIN Ben | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 11 | CHOE Andrew | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 12 | WANG Tristan | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
| 13 | GISLER Benjamin B. | 1% | 8% | 35% | 39% | 16% | 2% |
| 14 | DOTSON Gus | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 15 | BASOK Nikita | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 21% | 3% |
| 16 | CHEN Matthew | 40% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 17 | KUCZAJDA Matthew | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 18 | SIMPSON Patrick | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% |
| 19 | NIXON Christian A. | - | - | 8% | 30% | 42% | 20% |
| 20 | PARK Vincent | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 21 | ZHANG Alec | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% |
| 22 | PARK Frederick | 2% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
| 23 | LI Jeffrey | 1% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 24 | MAGDA Daniel | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% |
| 25 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 26 | SHEN Max | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% |
| 27 | LIANG Aaron | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
| 28 | JORDAN Anton | 6% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 2% |
| 29 | WANG Clayton | 12% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 30 | WU Jonathan | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 31 | BANKULLA Nihal R. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 32 | MILLER Kurt | 56% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | WHITEHURST JJ | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 34 | SVIBEN Cameron | 2% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 34 | MARTINEZ Joshua | 3% | 20% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 36 | SCHLESINGER Nathan | - | - | 4% | 22% | 48% | 25% |
| 37 | SKAALAND Will | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 38 | REID Michael | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 39 | BLUM Oliver | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 40 | LI Jalen | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 41 | HERMANSON David B. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% |
| 42 | KUBATIN Anton V. | 35% | 51% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | NAVIK Roy | 41% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | JENNINGS Adin | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 45 | FENWICK Luke A. | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 46 | CHEN Jun Ho | 19% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 47 | ERDEK Michael | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 48 | CAO Albert | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.