Oaks, PA - Oaks, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | KIM Byung | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
2 | JOSEPH William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 15% |
3 | WU Byron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
3 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 33% | 4% |
5 | GARCIA-ROGERS Lucas H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
6 | STEVENS Daniel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
7 | NOVOJILOV Alexei | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
8 | WADE Grayson | 100% | 90% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
9 | MISHIMA Torata | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 4% |
10 | SERAFIN Ben | 100% | 99% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
11 | CHOE Andrew | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
12 | WANG Tristan | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
13 | GISLER Benjamin B. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | 18% | 2% |
14 | DOTSON Gus | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
15 | BASOK Nikita | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 3% |
16 | CHEN Matthew | 100% | 60% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
17 | KUCZAJDA Matthew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 14% |
18 | SIMPSON Patrick | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% |
19 | NIXON Christian A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 20% |
20 | PARK Vincent | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
21 | ZHANG Alec | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% |
22 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
23 | LI Jeffrey | 100% | 99% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
24 | MAGDA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 9% |
25 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
26 | SHEN Max | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% |
27 | LIANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
28 | JORDAN Anton | 100% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
29 | WANG Clayton | 100% | 88% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - |
30 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
31 | BANKULLA Nihal R. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
32 | MILLER Kurt | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
33 | WHITEHURST JJ | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
34 | SVIBEN Cameron | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
34 | MARTINEZ Joshua | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
36 | SCHLESINGER Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 25% |
37 | SKAALAND Will | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
38 | REID Michael | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
39 | BLUM Oliver | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - |
40 | LI Jalen | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 3% | - |
41 | HERMANSON David B. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
42 | KUBATIN Anton V. | 100% | 65% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
43 | NAVIK Roy | 100% | 59% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
44 | JENNINGS Adin | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - |
45 | FENWICK Luke A. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
46 | CHEN Jun Ho | 100% | 81% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
47 | ERDEK Michael | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
48 | CAO Albert | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.