Rocky Point, NY - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GRAHAM Roy J. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
2 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 55% |
3 | LI Richard | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 65% |
3 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | 3% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
5 | MARX Oscar L. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 39% | |
6 | ZHAI Jeffrey | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
7 | RUSADZE Nickolas | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% | |
8 | ORVANANOS Jorge | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 9% | |
9 | BING Charles | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 42% | 46% |
10 | DAI Jonathan T. | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
10 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
12 | SIU Aiden | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 20% | 3% | |
13 | LIN Michael | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 8% | |
14 | MOHAMED Amir | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
15 | LEE Jacob J | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
16 | ANTON Nathaniel | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
17 | KEE Andrew L. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
18 | LI Arvin | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
19 | GARCIA Sebastian R. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% | |
20 | WU Alexander | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% | |
21 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | - | - | - | 6% | 30% | 47% | 17% |
22 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 24% | 4% |
23 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
24 | JIANG Owen | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
24 | LI Aaron | - | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
26 | CATINO Brennen | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
27 | LIN James G. | - | 2% | 18% | 43% | 31% | 6% | |
28 | WANG Mason | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
29 | MOHAMED Murad | - | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
30 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
31 | GUO Sean | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 2% |
32 | PLASTARAS Trey | 14% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | |
33 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 3% |
34 | LI Eric | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 45% | 17% | |
35 | KNIZHNIK David | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
36 | LIU Derek | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
37 | ZHEN Ethan | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
38 | CANO Marcos E. | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
39 | PO Oliver | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
40 | BADLANI Dev | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 1% | - |
41 | LEE Jonah | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
42 | TORRES Treston | 1% | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
43 | EDISON Ansel | 32% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
44 | PAN Henry | 2% | 17% | 46% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
45 | TIKHAEV Alexander | 21% | 45% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
46 | LEWIS Akhil | 7% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 9% | 2% | - |
47 | GUO Justin | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
48 | CHEN Kyle P. | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
49 | SONG Austin | 5% | 32% | 43% | 17% | 2% | - | |
50 | WECHSLER Jacob | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
51 | REZA Farazi | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
52 | YAO Bradley | 4% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - | |
53 | MARX Jackson L. | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 45% | 16% | |
54 | KANG Anthony | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
55 | LI Ayren | - | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
56 | SONG Bryan | - | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
56 | ZHENG zhe | 2% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
58 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
59 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
60 | CHENG Ethan | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
61 | XU Ethan | 7% | 37% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | |
62 | TANG August L. | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
63 | XU Andy P. | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
64 | WONG Jackson | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
65 | TANG Alexander L. | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
66 | MAO Lucas | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
67 | TANG Albert | 15% | 40% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | |
68 | KIAYIAS Aris | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
69 | HUANG Eythan | 37% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
70 | ORTEGA Jose-Arnel | - | 3% | 22% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - |
71 | SHAO Eric | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
72 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | < 1% | 4% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
73 | DALBERG Anders | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
74 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 41% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
75 | LI Allen | 61% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | |
75 | WYNTER Timothy | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | |
77 | PEDERSEN Charles | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
77 | WANG jason | 98% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - |
79 | HIGGASON Hugh | 37% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.