King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | KUMAR Aidan | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
2 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
3 | RICHARD Owen | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% |
3 | CHOI Marcus | - | 11% | 43% | 39% | 7% | |
5 | CHOI Mason | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 23% |
6 | TAHOUN Aly | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
7 | CAO Albert | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
8 | WU Jonathan | - | 10% | 44% | 39% | 6% | |
9 | ZHAO corey | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% | |
10 | PARK Frederick | - | 2% | 18% | 45% | 34% | |
11 | BORODITSKY Ethan | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% | |
12 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | 3% | 18% | 41% | 34% | 5% | |
13 | LEE Hudson | 4% | 27% | 45% | 21% | 3% | |
14 | MAHESH Tarun | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - |
15 | DODIN David | - | 1% | 11% | 42% | 45% | |
16 | GAO Daniel | - | 6% | 29% | 45% | 20% | |
17 | MACARTY Jordan T. | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
18 | WOLFE Alex | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
19 | CAO Brad | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 12% |
20 | BINDAS Odinn A. | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
21 | SHCHUR Landon | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% |
22 | WANG Max S | 10% | 53% | 31% | 5% | - | |
23 | JIN Daniel | - | 6% | 28% | 47% | 19% | |
24 | SINGH Aryaman | 19% | 47% | 29% | 6% | - | |
25 | FENG du | 67% | 28% | 4% | - | - | |
26 | CHEN Jun Ho | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
27 | LEE Samuel Y. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
28 | CHERPELIS George | 7% | 42% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
29 | ZHANG William | 41% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | |
30 | ROLLO Emmett H. | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
31 | LAI Aiden | 32% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
32 | LAI Boden | 18% | 42% | 32% | 8% | - | |
33 | ZHANG Richard | 2% | 21% | 44% | 28% | 6% | |
34 | CHANG Benjamin | 17% | 41% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
35 | ZHANG ethan | 3% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - |
36 | HU Robert J. | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
37 | XIE Brandon | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - |
38 | SINGH Ravin | 13% | 38% | 36% | 12% | 1% | |
39 | WANG Trontour | 27% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
40 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 5% |
41 | SHOUSHA Yassin | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
42 | LAM Alan | 2% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
43 | PARK Nicholas | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
44 | DA GRACA Tyler | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.