King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | KUMAR Aidan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
2 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 13% |
3 | RICHARD Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% |
3 | CHOI Marcus | 100% | 100% | 88% | 46% | 7% | |
5 | CHOI Mason | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% |
6 | TAHOUN Aly | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
7 | CAO Albert | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
8 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 89% | 46% | 6% | |
9 | ZHAO corey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | |
10 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 34% | |
11 | BORODITSKY Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | |
12 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% | 5% | |
13 | LEE Hudson | 100% | 96% | 69% | 24% | 3% | |
14 | MAHESH Tarun | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - |
15 | DODIN David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 45% | |
16 | GAO Daniel | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 20% | |
17 | MACARTY Jordan T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% |
18 | WOLFE Alex | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
19 | CAO Brad | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 12% |
20 | BINDAS Odinn A. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
21 | SHCHUR Landon | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
22 | WANG Max S | 100% | 90% | 37% | 6% | - | |
23 | JIN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 19% | |
24 | SINGH Aryaman | 100% | 81% | 34% | 6% | - | |
25 | FENG du | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | |
26 | CHEN Jun Ho | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
27 | LEE Samuel Y. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
28 | CHERPELIS George | 100% | 93% | 51% | 12% | 1% | |
29 | ZHANG William | 100% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | |
30 | ROLLO Emmett H. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
31 | LAI Aiden | 100% | 68% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
32 | LAI Boden | 100% | 82% | 40% | 9% | - | |
33 | ZHANG Richard | 100% | 98% | 78% | 34% | 6% | |
34 | CHANG Benjamin | 100% | 83% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
35 | ZHANG ethan | 100% | 97% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - |
36 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
37 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 5% | - |
38 | SINGH Ravin | 100% | 87% | 48% | 12% | 1% | |
39 | WANG Trontour | 100% | 73% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
40 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 32% | 5% |
41 | SHOUSHA Yassin | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - |
42 | LAM Alan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
43 | PARK Nicholas | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
44 | DA GRACA Tyler | 100% | 25% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.