Greater Richmond Convention Center - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
| 2 | LEONE III Charles D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 48% |
| 3 | CHEN Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
| 3 | WANG Clayton | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
| 5 | TRIMMER Colin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 6 | KROPP Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% |
| 7 | ZHANG Caden | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 8 | LEE Samuel Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
| 9 | MURPHY Thomas P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 30% | 4% |
| 10 | KIM Dylan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 14% |
| 11 | SU Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 31% |
| 12 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 31% |
| 13 | CLICK Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
| 14 | KARNAS Karol | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | USDIN Anton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | 5% |
| 16 | WANG Tristan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 3% |
| 17 | CAO Albert | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 18 | NORTH Alexander M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 11% |
| 19 | JORDAN Anton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 8% |
| 20 | CHAMBLISS Logan C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 21 | FISHMAN Rahm | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | TIRADO Giancarlo | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 23 | WANG Trontour | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | JONES Tyler | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 25 | ZHANG Richard | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 26 | KWOUN Miles S. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 7% | - |
| 27 | HUTTO Joshua | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 28 | DUAN eric | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 29 | METZLER Calder | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 30 | ROTHKA Spencer J. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 31 | BRUNDAGE Nevan | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 32 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 85% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | BERNARD Jack B. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 34 | LEE JoonWon | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 34 | SINGH Aryaman | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 36 | HEADRICK Lance | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 37 | TIKHONOV Iliya | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 38 | LIN Harrison | 100% | 87% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 39 | SNYDER Ari | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 40 | PENHOET Adrien E. | 100% | 92% | 57% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | POIST Wylie | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 42 | GRENKE Wyatt | 100% | 94% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | CIGLIANO Benjamin I. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 44 | GLENNON Sebastian J. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 45 | PALAMARCHUK Matthew | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 46 | ZHANG Andy | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | LAM Alan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 48 | FU Ethan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 49 | TIKHONOV Daniel | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 50 | GANTSOUDES Isaac | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 51 | SELLAR Ian | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | CHUNG Andrew | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | JONES Colin | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | MORAN Joseph | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 54 | AMOLSCH Dylan | 100% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 56 | RUIZ Jayden | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.