Durkan Fencing Academy - Garfield, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WU Joseph | V V V V D | V V V V V | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 2 | EKE Frank | V V D V D | V V V V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 3 | KIM Byung | V V V D V | V V V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 3 | BEZRODNOV Michael | V V D V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 5 | ZHANG Jie | D V D V V | V V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 6 | CAO Albert | D V V V D | V V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 7 | RICHARD Owen | V D V D D | V V V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 8 | KOBI Samuel | D D D V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 9 | YUROVCHAK Andrew T. | V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 10 | BORODITSKY Ethan | V D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 11 | BEZRODNOV Alexander | D V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 12 | JIN Owen | V V V D D | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 13 | VERMEULE Spencer | D V D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 14 | MACARTY Jordan T. | V D V D V | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 15 | MISHIMA Torata | D V V V D | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 16 | WU Jason | D V V D V | V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 17 | GAO Daniel | V V V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 18 | ARAVIND Athreya | V V V V D | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 19 | COLLYMORE Spencer T. | V V V D V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 20 | SCHULZE Ethan | V V V V D | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 21 | SHEN Max | V V V D V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 22 | LI Jalen | V D V V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 23 | KOKENGE Clark | V D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 24 | KUMAR Aidan | D V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 25 | LIEF Isaac R. | V V D D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 25 | ZHANG YuJian | D V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 27 | MORSE Tyler | D D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 28 | JUN Jaywu | D V D D V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 29 | JONES Tyler | D V V D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 30 | PARK Nicholas | V V D D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 31 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 32 | LI Jeffrey | D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 33 | HE Lawrence | V V D V V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 34 | KOKENGE Reid | D V V D V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 35 | PARK Frederick | D D V V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 36 | CAO Brad | V D V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 37 | LEE JoonWon | V D V D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 38 | SUN Kang | D D D V V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 39 | CHANG Che | D D V V D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 40 | TIRRELL Justin J. | D V D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 41 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 42 | LAM Bill | V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 43 | PAHLAVI Kamran | V D D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 44 | ZHANG Zixian (Shawn) | V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 45 | WERR Tyler | V D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 46 | KOKENGE Chad | V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 47 | WIECHMANN Colin | D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 48 | PRIHODKO Max | D D D V D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 49 | BASOK Nikita | D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 50 | GAO "George" Xiaojiang | D D D D V | D | 0.1 | 1 | +0.9 |
| 51 | IARIKOV Nicholas | D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 52 | REDDY Arya | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 53 | SUN James H. | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.