The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

BladeRunner ROC/RJC

Junior Men's Épée

Sunday, October 30, 2022 at 1:30 PM

Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 MOSES Alexander 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 59%
2 PARK Elliot 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 53% 14%
3 WANG Devon 100% 100% 100% 96% 83% 52% 16%
3 LO Jake 100% 100% 99% 95% 78% 44% 11%
5 CHIRASHNYA Daniel 100% 100% 94% 68% 24%
6 ZHENG Haoran 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 53% 16%
7 GAO Chaney C. 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 36% 7%
8 JIN Daniel 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 19%
9 KIM Benjamin I. 100% 100% 100% 99% 95% 76% 35%
10 SINGHA Orion 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 60% 20%
11 DIECK Logan O. 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 32%
12 KIM Nathan 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 45% 12%
13 HIGGINS Branford 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 42% 10%
14 JEON Alexander E. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 67%
15 WESTON Tom 100% 100% 98% 88% 62% 26% 5%
16 LIU Andrew 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 23% 3%
17 ULINICH Alexander 100% 100% 98% 87% 56% 19% 2%
18 LOGUE Ethan D. 100% 100% 100% 96% 81% 47% 12%
19 KOPPE Alexander 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 30% 4%
20 WATT Darren 100% 98% 85% 55% 22% 4%
21 BRISLAWN Reilly R. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 41%
22 KIM Sullivan 100% 99% 92% 69% 34% 9% 1%
23 FU Leon 100% 98% 86% 56% 22% 4%
24 SARKAR Agniv 100% 99% 92% 67% 29% 5%
25 DEKERMANJI Christopher 100% 99% 93% 68% 29% 5%
26 CASTELLY Luke 100% 98% 85% 56% 23% 4%
27 WRIGHT Christopher 100% 100% 99% 90% 59% 17%
28 SINHA Zaan 100% 99% 90% 63% 27% 6% -
29 QUITORIANO Matthew 100% 98% 85% 55% 22% 4% -
30 KIM Darius H. 100% 99% 93% 73% 38% 9%
31 LEE Bryson 100% 97% 80% 46% 15% 2% -
32 KNUDSEN Travis 100% 98% 84% 52% 19% 3% -
33 KANG Philip F. 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 41%
34 PARKER Lane S. 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 33% 4%
35 KIM Donghyeok 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 30%
36 EVERS Gabriel 100% 97% 77% 39% 10% 1%
37 SCHROEDER Dylan 100% 99% 91% 65% 30% 7% 1%
38 DAO Alexander 100% 98% 85% 55% 22% 5% -
39 LIU Felix 100% 99% 94% 73% 38% 10% 1%
40 ZHANG Nathan 100% 100% 96% 79% 45% 13% 1%
41 ZHANG Alec 100% 100% 99% 92% 71% 37% 9%
42 HE Zhiheng 100% 100% 97% 84% 53% 20% 3%
43 ZHUANG William 100% 95% 76% 43% 15% 3% -
44 WARD Edward 100% 97% 77% 40% 11% 1%
45 MING Nathan 100% 99% 92% 70% 35% 10% 1%
46 LIU Noah 100% 88% 55% 21% 4% - -
47 BURLING Trenor 100% 97% 82% 48% 16% 2% -
48 RAJ Shrey 100% 78% 34% 7% 1%
49 LIU Yikun 100% 87% 52% 18% 3% - -
50 LEE Chun Po 100% 97% 81% 45% 13% 1%
51 YAO Derek (Shunyu) 100% 97% 81% 48% 17% 3%
52 DONAHUE Lake 100% 94% 72% 38% 13% 2% -
53 MENDOZA Zachari 100% 100% 98% 87% 59% 24% 4%
54 CHOI San 100% 96% 71% 32% 8% 1% -
55 JU Hanul 100% 86% 51% 18% 3% - -
56 JACKEL Dylan 100% 97% 76% 39% 12% 2% -
57 PAK Elliot 100% 99% 87% 55% 21% 4% -
58 GULLO Kenji Y. 100% 99% 94% 75% 43% 15% 2%
59 CHU Allan 100% 100% 98% 88% 60% 24% 4%
60 CROSSMAN Brandon 100% 95% 70% 29% 5%
61 PEÑA Ethan 100% 82% 45% 15% 3% -
62 BAGCHI Aritra 100% 95% 75% 42% 14% 3% -
63 POSSON Luke 100% 93% 68% 31% 7% 1% -
64 PRAKASH Hari 100% 85% 48% 16% 3% - -
65 NALBANDIAN Vahan P. 100% 89% 58% 24% 5% 1% -
66 MIAO Kunqi 100% 75% 31% 6% -
67 MCCOWN Ronan 100% 94% 70% 34% 9% 1% -
68 BAZHENOV Anthony 100% 96% 77% 45% 16% 3% -
69 SARKAR Anish 100% 99% 92% 66% 31% 8% 1%
70 ERLIKHMAN Adrian 100% 93% 67% 30% 7% 1% -
71 HUSSAIN Kamran 100% 100% 94% 67% 23%
72 PARK Augustine 100% 87% 51% 17% 3% -
73 NG Biwon 100% 77% 36% 9% 1% -
74 KIM Taeho 100% 79% 39% 11% 1% - -
75 YUEN Nathan 100% 84% 48% 16% 3% - -
76 CHAKRAVARTHY Arjun 100% 43% 9% 1% - - -
77 PAINTER Noah 100% 61% 20% 3% - - -
78 CHEN Bailey 100% 99% 86% 53% 19% 4% -
79 GU Aidan 100% 93% 68% 32% 9% 1% -
80 YU Austin 100% 86% 51% 18% 3% - -
81 MCDONALD Ethan 100% 95% 74% 38% 11% 1% -
82 TUSANTOSO McKenzie 100% 81% 42% 12% 2% - -
83 LOFTUS Luca 100% 73% 31% 7% 1% -
84 QUITORIANO Jonathan 100% 85% 46% 14% 2% -
85 RAINEY Daniel 100% 96% 72% 35% 9% 1% -
86 LI Zerong 100% 44% 9% 1% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.