Morris Cup Spring RYC/RJCC

Junior Men's Épée

Sunday, March 19, 2023 at 8:00 AM

SportsPlex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 GAO Daniel 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 61% 18%
2 RICHARD Owen 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 53% 16%
3 PRIHODKO Max 100% 100% 97% 81% 46% 12%
3 IARIKOV Nicholas 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 75% 31%
5 ZHANG YuJian 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 37%
6 WU Joseph 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 65%
7 AGAON Ethan 100% 100% 98% 87% 59% 24% 4%
8 DODIN David 100% 100% 100% 96% 81% 46% 12%
9 MISHIMA Torata 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 66% 25%
10 HE Lawrence 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 40%
11 JIN Owen 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 55%
12 AGAON Shawn 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 59% 19%
13 KIM Tei D. 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 38% 8%
14 LI Zachary 100% 100% 97% 77% 36% 8% -
15 TUMIBAY Noah C. 100% 100% 97% 83% 50% 14%
16 LEE Seungwon 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 19%
17 SVERDLOV Seth 100% 100% 99% 91% 61% 22% 3%
18 BASOK Nikita 100% 100% 100% 95% 76% 41% 10%
19 THAKUR Om S. 100% 100% 98% 89% 61% 24% 4%
20 PAN Tristan 100% 100% 95% 76% 40% 10% 1%
21 WU Jonathan 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 67% 25%
22 LEE Noah 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 60% 19%
23 SUN Jason 100% 100% 94% 71% 35% 9% 1%
24 ZHANG Zixian (Shawn) 100% 100% 95% 72% 35% 9% 1%
25 FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 43% 8%
26 SONG Troy 100% 98% 83% 49% 16% 2% -
27 ZAYDMAN Ethan 100% 100% 98% 90% 64% 28% 5%
28 KOYFMAN Benjamin 100% 99% 92% 67% 31% 8% 1%
29 ZHAI Avalo 100% 100% 96% 77% 42% 13% 1%
30 NESTERCZUK Maddox W. 100% 97% 75% 37% 10% 1% -
31 REDDY Arya 100% 97% 75% 38% 11% 2% -
32 DORASZELSKI Mark 100% 99% 88% 58% 23% 4% -
33 SAVORETTI Francesco 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 60% 18%
34 KNOX James 100% 100% 99% 95% 79% 45% 12%
35 XIAO Hanzhi (Shawn) 100% 100% 96% 81% 49% 17% 2%
36 ZHAO Luhan 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 65% 24%
37 ARAVIND Athreya 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 31% 6%
38 NATSVLISHVILI John Vano 100% 99% 92% 70% 36% 10% 1%
39 LAM Alan 100% 100% 94% 74% 38% 10% 1%
40 DIXON Thomas 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 41% 8%
41 FUSSMAN Yuval 100% 98% 86% 55% 21% 4% -
42 SHA Michael 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 24% 4%
43 ZHANG ethan 100% 96% 77% 42% 13% 2% -
44 CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. 100% 100% 100% 95% 77% 38% 5%
45 MAO Benjamin 100% 99% 94% 74% 40% 12% 1%
46 QUINLAN Sean 100% 92% 65% 30% 8% 1% -
47 CHEN Jun Ho 100% 99% 92% 67% 32% 8% 1%
48 SUN Jeffery 100% 97% 76% 38% 10% 1% -
49 LAI Aedin 100% 100% 97% 83% 49% 14% 1%
50 LI Chenyu 100% 100% 96% 79% 42% 11% 1%
51 ZHANG William 100% 97% 78% 43% 14% 2% -
52 LAI Boden 100% 95% 73% 36% 9% 1%
53 HU Anton 100% 79% 39% 10% 1% -
54 ZOU Xianyang (Max) 100% 96% 77% 42% 13% 2% -
55 BLANCO Sebastian 100% 96% 75% 40% 12% 2% -
56 SCAPICCHIO Stephen 100% 91% 61% 26% 6% 1% -
57 SUN James H. 100% 100% 94% 62% 22% 3% -
58 SHCHUR Landon 100% 100% 96% 79% 43% 11%
59 OSTIGUY Cameron 100% 100% 92% 65% 28% 6% 1%
60 FENG Du 100% 98% 83% 50% 18% 3% -
61 RIVERA Louis 100% 85% 46% 13% 2% - -
62 YAO Bowen 100% 93% 64% 28% 7% 1% -
63 JONELEIT Aidan 100% 76% 34% 8% 1% - -
64 JIANG Matthew 100% 90% 57% 21% 4% - -
65 VANODIA Dev 100% 100% 96% 77% 43% 13% 1%
66 TATE William Isom 100% 84% 46% 14% 2% - -
67 NOHILLY Patrick 100% 56% 17% 3% - - -
68 REPIC Oliver 100% 86% 50% 17% 3% - -
69 ZHANG Roland 100% 60% 19% 3% - - -
70 STELTENKAMP Neal 100% 80% 39% 9% 1% - -
71 GANESAN Mathavan 100% 85% 47% 15% 2% -
72 WONG King-Yee 100% 89% 55% 19% 3% - -
73 SOSNICK Samuel 100% 39% 7% 1% - - -
74 BHARGAVA Vivaan 100% 82% 45% 14% 3% - -
75 LAM Bill 100% 99% 90% 62% 25% 5% -
76 ZANELLI Ben 100% 98% 82% 47% 16% 2% -
77 HIGGINS Jett 100% 92% 66% 32% 9% 1% -
78 KLINKENBERG Patrick 100% 46% 7% - - - -
79 JUNAID Nazim 100% 44% 9% 1% - - -
80 DUSSEAU Maddax 100% 92% 63% 26% 6% 1% -
81 DEGENHARDT Zenji 100% 71% 29% 6% 1% - -
82 HUA Daniel 100% 76% 20% 2% - - -
83 LEIBOWITZ Ryan 100% 85% 41% 10% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.