Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
| 2 | MANZ Hamilton R. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 3 | KING Cameron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 24% |
| 3 | JEYOON Ryan S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | |
| 5 | PARK Ian C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% |
| 6 | WIMMER Chandler M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% |
| 7 | KIM Edward J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% | 15% | |
| 8 | TUMIBAY Noah C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% | |
| 9 | CHAWLA Armaan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 6% |
| 10 | LEE Shwan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 31% |
| 11 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 12 | MISHIMA Torata | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 2% | |
| 13 | MIN MARCUS | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 14 | CHEN Eric | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | RAWSON Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 16 | WHITMORE James C. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 17 | JANG Elliot | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 18 | JIN daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 18% | |
| 19 | KIM Prestin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 7% | - |
| 20 | SIMMONS Tristan A. | 100% | 80% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 21 | CAO Albert | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 22 | FU Ethan | 100% | 97% | 73% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 23 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | ILYAS Zakariya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% |
| 25 | MURPHY Thomas P. | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 26 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | ZHANG Andy | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 28 | MARGHUB Safi | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 29 | TREBON Hayden | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 22% | 5% | 1% |
| 30 | CAO Brad | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
| 31 | KOTCHEN Peter Trammell | 100% | 99% | 86% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 32 | CHO Hyunseong | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 33 | GEHRKE Nate | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% | |
| 34 | STANCILL Hunter G. | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 35 | SHARMA Om V. | 100% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 36 | SHOUSHA Yassin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 37 | MORAN Joseph | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 38 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | AKOCS Ethan | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 40 | DURINGTON Wyatt S. | 100% | 91% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.