The Fencing Center of San Jose - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
2 | SARKAR Anish | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
3 | ANDERSON Kai | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | - |
3 | CHEN Bailey | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | |
5 | ZAYDMAN David M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% |
6 | GENCHEV Madav | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
7 | CASTELLY Luke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% |
8 | CHANG Andrew | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 7% | 1% |
9 | SEO Shawn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 15% |
10 | JAIN Samyak | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
11 | LEE Bryson | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
12 | DOWDELL Riley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 11% |
13 | LIU Noah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 14% | 1% |
14 | SIM Ian | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
15 | JONES Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 52% | 13% |
16 | CHAKRAVARTHY Arjun | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
17 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
18 | LOMIO Nicholas A. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% | |
18 | YUEN Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | |
20 | MANA Arnav | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - | |
21 | CLAES Thomas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - |
22 | LAI Alexander | 100% | 97% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
23 | TONG Samuel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
24 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% | |
25 | ZHUANG William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
26 | RICHARD silas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 9% |
27 | PIVOVAROV Lucas | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
28 | WONG Preston | 100% | 91% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
29 | NG Biwon | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
30 | WONG Ethan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
31 | WU Johnny y. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
32 | SARKAR Agniv | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% | |
33 | ROBINSON Samuel | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - |
34 | LEVENTAL Mark | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
35 | GUO Woody | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
36 | CHENG Trevor | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
37 | PLOSCARU Matthew | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - |
38 | LI Yunji (Rain) | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% | |
39 | BHARGAV Angad | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | |
40 | HSU Joshua | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
41 | YAN Eric | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
42 | LIN Jason | 100% | 65% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
43 | GADHVI Darius | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
44 | YOUNG Quentin | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
45 | MITCHEM Paolo | 100% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
46 | KIM Remington | 100% | 66% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
47 | WEBB Jeremey | 100% | 57% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.