Cleveland, OH - Cleveland, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
2 | KHANNA Nikhil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 37% |
3 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% |
3 | LEE Samuel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% |
5 | SU Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 7% |
6 | KATS Dylan G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 33% |
7 | GREGSTON Layland | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
8 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% | |
9 | SHCHUR Landon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | |
10 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 26% | 3% |
11 | LOISEAU Eliott | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% | |
12 | SKORUPAN Grant | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 21% |
13 | RICHARDS Colin W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
14 | FANG Hanning | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | |
15 | MENDOZA Zander | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - |
16 | SAUNIER Cameron | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
17 | DODIN David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% |
18 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
19 | LO Jake | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
20 | WONG Adrian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
21 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
22 | IARIKOV Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% |
23 | GUO ZIXU | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
24 | WANG zhixing(Danile) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
25 | JIANG Matthew | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
26 | CHUTKAY Sai Pratham | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 15% |
27 | BANSAL Arjun | 100% | 81% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
28 | SHOUSHA Hamza | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 16% | 1% |
29 | ZHANG Yuelin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 9% | |
30 | CHIN Dylan A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
31 | PARK Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% | |
32 | ZHANG Kingston | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - | |
33 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
34 | BRODSKY Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
35 | ROMANOV Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 25% | 3% |
37 | ESKRIDGE Caleb | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
38 | JONES Reilly | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
39 | STANTIAL Grant | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
41 | ZHANG Michael | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
41 | LEWIS Jonathan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
43 | RIPA Joseph K. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
44 | PAN Tristan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 4% | |
45 | KAUSHISH Rayirth | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - |
46 | YU Austin | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
47 | KIM Jayden | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
48 | HU Anton | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
49 | KENT V David | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
50 | CHAI Ethan | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
50 | LI Zachary | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
52 | BUERGISSER Tae | 100% | 87% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
53 | CHUNG Michael | 100% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
54 | MAO Lucas | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | |
55 | CAMP Ethan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
56 | GINZBURG Adam | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
57 | ZHAI Avalo | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - |
58 | LEE John | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - |
59 | FARBER Ian S. | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
59 | MAXU Tiger | 100% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
61 | ALI Farhan | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
62 | WOLFE Alex | 100% | 84% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | |
63 | BUHEIS Lucas I. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
64 | CHEN Zhengyang | 100% | 92% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
65 | WANG Xiuqi(Arthur) | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - |
66 | HUANG Yidong Allen | 100% | 89% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
67 | FANG SHUOMING | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
68 | SCHAFF Wolfgang W. | 100% | 41% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.