New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | EKE Frank | - | - | 4% | 24% | 46% | 26% | |
| 2 | LEE Noah | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
| 3 | COLLYMORE Spencer T. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
| 3 | GALLANT Antoine | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% |
| 5 | WU Joseph | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
| 6 | JUN Jaywu | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 12% |
| 7 | SALERNO Gaetano | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
| 8 | SHAH Maximilian A. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 9 | PRIHODKO Max | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 10 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
| 11 | HE Lawrence | - | - | 2% | 14% | 39% | 35% | 10% |
| 12 | PIERANUNZI IV Wills | - | - | 5% | 26% | 45% | 23% | |
| 13 | LANGTON Sawyer | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 44% | 25% |
| 14 | KOKENGE Reid | - | - | 5% | 20% | 39% | 31% | 6% |
| 15 | DYER Ian E. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 10% |
| 16 | PLOTNICHENKO Vsevolod | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 17 | PAHLAVI Kamran | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 18 | KATS Dylan G. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 42% | 18% |
| 19 | CHOI Mason | - | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 20 | SKAALAND Will | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 21 | JOSLIN Tyler | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 7% | 1% |
| 22 | ROLLO Emmett H. | - | 6% | 27% | 42% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 22 | KHALITOV Alexander | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 24 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% |
| 24 | SKORUPAN Grant | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 26 | ROYTBURD Samuel | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 27 | KARAMANIAN Nicholas | 6% | 29% | 41% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 28 | BORODITSKY Ethan | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 15% |
| 29 | PAVATE Rishi | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 30 | SUN Jason | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 31 | SUN Jeffery | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | GONG Haixiang | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | SACCOMANNO Shelby | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 34 | FRASSETTO Marcus A. | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | BHATIA Rahil | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 36 | WALCH Logan | 4% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 37 | CHANG Benjamin | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 38 | CHENESKI Brady | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
| 39 | BEALS Alden | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 40 | ZHANG William | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 41 | KUBATIN Anton V. | 36% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 42 | ZHAO corey | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 43 | BELLIVEAU Emmett S. | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 44 | SOSNICK Samuel | 27% | 47% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 45 | AMELOT Alexander | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 46 | GAO Daniel | 19% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | ZHANG Zixian (Shawn) | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 48 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | 2% | 16% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 48 | XIE Brandon | 1% | 12% | 36% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 50 | WU Jonathan | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | MORTIMER Gavin | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 52 | LAI Aiden | 23% | 50% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 53 | RIPA Joseph K. | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | JACKSON Nicholas | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 55 | CAETANO Joshua | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.