New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | EKE Frank | V V V V V | V V V V V | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 2 | LEE Noah | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 3 | COLLYMORE Spencer T. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 3 | GALLANT Antoine | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 5 | WU Joseph | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 6 | JUN Jaywu | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 7 | SALERNO Gaetano | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 8 | SHAH Maximilian A. | V V V V D V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 9 | PRIHODKO Max | D V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 10 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | V V V D V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 11 | HE Lawrence | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 12 | PIERANUNZI IV Wills | V D V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 13 | LANGTON Sawyer | V D D V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 14 | KOKENGE Reid | V V V V D D | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 15 | DYER Ian E. | D V V V D V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 16 | PLOTNICHENKO Vsevolod | D V V V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 17 | PAHLAVI Kamran | V V D V V V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 18 | KATS Dylan G. | V V V D V V | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 19 | CHOI Mason | V V D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 20 | SKAALAND Will | D V V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 21 | JOSLIN Tyler | V V D V V D | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 22 | ROLLO Emmett H. | D V V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 22 | KHALITOV Alexander | V V D D V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 24 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | D V V D V V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 24 | SKORUPAN Grant | V D D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 26 | ROYTBURD Samuel | V V V D D V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 27 | KARAMANIAN Nicholas | D V V V D | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 28 | BORODITSKY Ethan | V V D D V D | V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
| 29 | PAVATE Rishi | V D V D D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 30 | SUN Jason | V D V V D D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 31 | SUN Jeffery | D V D D D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 32 | GONG Haixiang | D D V V D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 33 | SACCOMANNO Shelby | D D V D D V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 34 | FRASSETTO Marcus A. | D D V V D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 35 | BHATIA Rahil | V D D V D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 36 | WALCH Logan | D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 37 | CHANG Benjamin | V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 38 | CHENESKI Brady | D V D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 39 | BEALS Alden | D D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 40 | ZHANG William | D D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 41 | KUBATIN Anton V. | D D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 42 | ZHAO corey | D D V D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 43 | BELLIVEAU Emmett S. | D D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 44 | SOSNICK Samuel | V D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 45 | AMELOT Alexander | D D D V D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 46 | GAO Daniel | D D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 47 | ZHANG Zixian (Shawn) | D D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 48 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | D D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 48 | XIE Brandon | D D D D V D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 50 | WU Jonathan | D D D D V D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 51 | MORTIMER Gavin | D V D D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 52 | LAI Aiden | V D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 53 | RIPA Joseph K. | D D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 54 | JACKSON Nicholas | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 55 | CAETANO Joshua | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.