Los Angeles Convention Center - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ITKIN Nick (Nikita) B. | - | - | - | - | - | 2% | 98% |
| 2 | KUMBLA Sidarth | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% |
| 3 | BOURTIS James S. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 59% |
| 3 | GASSNER Ethan I. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% |
| 5 | LOUIE Bryce | - | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 84% |
| 6 | GRIFFITH JACK | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% |
| 7 | GRAHAM Roy J. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 8 | CO Dylan | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 9 | LEE Jacob J | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 40% | 17% |
| 10 | CHAMLEY-WATSON Miles C. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 37% | 55% |
| 11 | SENIC Lucas | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 12 | DESHMUKH Arjun | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 13 | WU Alexander | - | - | 3% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 6% |
| 14 | SISINNI Riccardo | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 2% |
| 15 | DERRICK Blake | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 16 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
| 17 | MATSAKH Philip | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 3% |
| 18 | BURKE Spencer W. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
| 19 | LIN Youlong | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 20 | ROSE Ben | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 21 | LEWIS Akhil | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% | - |
| 22 | MITBERG Gregory W. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% |
| 23 | LIN James G. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 24 | KUMBLA Samarth | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% | |
| 25 | GUERRA Gabriel H. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 3% | |
| 26 | DESERANNO Jeidus | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 20% |
| 27 | BRUK Peter J. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 28 | OURSLER Jack | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 29 | KATAYAMA Kevin | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 30 | LIN Michael | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 3% |
| 31 | YU Vinni | - | - | 4% | 20% | 41% | 30% | 5% |
| 32 | XU Andy P. | 11% | 37% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | KAO Castor T. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 30% |
| 34 | CANLAS Nathan | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 35 | RUSADZE Nickolas | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% | |
| 36 | ONIK Elijah T. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 25% |
| 37 | LEWIS Paul D. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 38 | DICKSON Farr R. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 39 | KIM Nicholas W. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 46% | 15% |
| 40 | TIYA BIAYA K. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
| 41 | GOOR Julian | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% | |
| 42 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | - | - | 3% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 43 | NDIAYE Edriss G. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
| 44 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 45 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 2% | 14% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 46 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% |
| 47 | DAI Jonathan T. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 4% |
| 48 | RADOSLAVOV Ivan-Asen | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 49 | WANG Aaron | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
| 50 | SHENG Dalton | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | CHEN Raymond | - | - | 4% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 7% |
| 52 | HUTH Mitchell | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 52 | LEE Aidan | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 36% | 12% |
| 54 | ZHANG Aaron | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 55 | SHAPIRO Leon | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 56 | NICOLETTI Luca | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 57 | ZHENG Alan H. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 58 | DIERKS Kian | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 59 | GONG Benjamin | 2% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 60 | MIN Eric | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 61 | LO Preston | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 62 | HUTH Jacob | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | |
| 63 | JAIN Aditya | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% | - |
| 64 | PARRISH Evan | 8% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 65 | KIM Ryan Y. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
| 66 | LO Conrad | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 27% |
| 67 | LE Jacob H. | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - | - |
| 68 | JIANG Owen | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 69 | PARK Sky | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 70 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
| 71 | QIAN Jason H. | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 72 | LI Matthew | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 73 | JEON Caleb A. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 74 | SONG Noel | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 75 | LIU Derek | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 76 | PARK Rion | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 77 | LEE Brendan | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 78 | YAO Bradley | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 79 | TANG Albert | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 80 | NGUYEN Martin | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 81 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | 12% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 82 | ZOBEL Eric H. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | |
| 83 | STANLEY Mason B. | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
| 84 | TANG Owen S. | 1% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 1% | |
| 85 | SONG Aiden S. | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 85 | KIM Yonjae | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
| 85 | FUKUDA Diego | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
| 88 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 5% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 7% | - | |
| 89 | KRYLTSOV Michael | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 90 | WU Trevor | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 91 | BADLANI Dev | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 92 | LEE Christopher T. | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 93 | KONG Luculentus X. | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 94 | CHEN Kyle P. | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 95 | LING Eddie | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 96 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 96 | WU Alistair | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 96 | MARTIN Darius | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 99 | WU Alber Y. | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 100 | HUANG Eythan | 12% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 101 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 1% |
| 102 | CHENG Ethan | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 103 | HOWLAND Jonas | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 104 | TAN Aidan | 22% | 41% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 105 | PO Oliver | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
| 106 | CHOI Ethan | 14% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 107 | SHAGIDANYAN German | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 108 | FENG Michael | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 109 | DINSAY Kristjan | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 110 | LIU William | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 111 | YI William W. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 112 | WANDJI Noah | 13% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 113 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 114 | TANG August L. | 18% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 115 | TALASILA Arush | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 116 | ZHANG Jacob | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 117 | GUTH Joseph | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 118 | PARKER Isaiah | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 118 | LEE Eugene | 32% | 44% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 120 | ROZALSKI Eli | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 121 | LEE Jonah | 17% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 122 | KIM Daniel Y. | 7% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 123 | STRUGAR Marcus A. | 17% | 41% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 124 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 125 | SISINNI Leonardo | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 126 | PINCHENG Yao | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 127 | TANG Alexander L. | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 127 | CHUANG Oscar | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 129 | LI Samuel | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.