Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LI Richard | - | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% |
| 2 | MARX Jackson L. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 51% |
| 3 | GRAHAM Roy J. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 27% | 71% |
| 3 | YANG Luao | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% |
| 5 | WU Alexander | - | - | 1% | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% |
| 6 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% |
| 7 | CULLIVAN Justice | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 41% | |
| 8 | RUSADZE Nickolas | - | - | - | - | 8% | 45% | 47% |
| 9 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
| 10 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 58% |
| 11 | GARCIA Sebastian R. | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 52% | 31% |
| 12 | DAI Jonathan T. | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 30% | 64% |
| 13 | CHEN Kyle P. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 17% |
| 14 | MIALL Steven A. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 45% | 25% |
| 15 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | - | - | 6% | 28% | 46% | 19% | |
| 16 | LI Eric | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% | |
| 17 | LEE Jacob J | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 4% |
| 18 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | - | - | 7% | 31% | 44% | 17% | |
| 19 | ZHAI Jeffrey | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 44% | 33% |
| 20 | ZHENG zhe | - | 3% | 20% | 43% | 29% | 6% | |
| 21 | GOOR Julian | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 30% |
| 22 | LI Matthew | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 10% | |
| 23 | LEE Aidan | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 49% |
| 24 | LIN Michael | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 1% |
| 25 | LIU Ethan | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 40% | 10% |
| 26 | TANG Owen S. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 33% | |
| 26 | LI Yao (Liam) | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 24% | |
| 28 | ZHEN Ethan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 43% | 13% |
| 29 | LIN James G. | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 30 | XIAO Benjamin | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 31 | YU Jason | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 2% |
| 32 | NICOLL William | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 33 | LI Chenglang Ryan | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 3% |
| 34 | PO Oliver | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 17% | |
| 35 | LIU Derek | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% | |
| 36 | WECHSLER Jacob | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 4% |
| 37 | LI Jinghua E. | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 38 | TANG Albert | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 39 | MASTROPAOLO Jonah W. | - | 6% | 30% | 47% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 40 | HUANG Eythan | 14% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | ZHOU Leon | - | 1% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 1% |
| 42 | PARK Joseph | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 43 | CHENG Ethan | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 1% |
| 43 | KOVACS Wyatt | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 39% | 13% | 1% |
| 43 | HUA Aiden | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 46 | GUO Justin | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | - |
| 47 | TANG August L. | - | - | 2% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 8% |
| 48 | CATINO Brennen | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 45% | 25% | |
| 49 | BAO Aaron | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% | |
| 50 | ARICO Trey | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 19% | 3% | |
| 51 | SHAO Eric | 1% | 11% | 36% | 38% | 13% | 1% | |
| 52 | XU Andy P. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 44% | 25% | |
| 53 | LIU Ryan | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | AROUH Dylan | - | - | 6% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 3% |
| 55 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 56 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 57 | MATSAKH Philip | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 57 | CHUNG Ethan Sheng Xuan | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
| 59 | XIANG Derrick | - | - | 3% | 21% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
| 60 | WANG Winston | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 61 | RADOSLAVOV Ivan-Asen | 9% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 62 | LIU Zixian (Aaron) | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 63 | DECORLETO III Andrew (Tripp) J. | 7% | 32% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 64 | AGRAWAL Niki | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 65 | LI Aaron | - | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 8% |
| 66 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 6% | 31% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 67 | YAO Bradley | - | 2% | 21% | 43% | 28% | 6% | |
| 68 | WANG Jackson | - | 9% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | |
| 69 | SHEN Mingxuan | - | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 70 | LEE Jonah | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 42% | 18% | 2% |
| 71 | LI Ayren | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
| 71 | JIA Jing Yu | 9% | 47% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 74 | SONG Austin | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 7% | - |
| 75 | TANG Alexander L. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 76 | CULHANE Dechen | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | |
| 77 | BOBROW Silas | - | 5% | 35% | 41% | 16% | 2% | |
| 78 | SHIM Peter S. | 1% | 11% | 36% | 37% | 13% | 1% | |
| 79 | LEWIS Nikhil I. | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 80 | WANG Julang | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 81 | LU Guanxun (James) | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 82 | JURMAN Therin | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 83 | WANG Mason | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 84 | TAN Aidan | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 85 | TIKHAEV Alexander | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 86 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 87 | XU Ethan | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 88 | GAO Payton | 6% | 32% | 43% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 89 | CHA James | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 90 | ARCE Andrew W. | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 91 | AKYAMAC Bora | 32% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 92 | WONG Jackson | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 93 | BANG Ian | 58% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 94 | SIMON Luke | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 95 | HE Yuxiang | - | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 96 | CAO Ray | 6% | 38% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 97 | RAJ Jay | 3% | 20% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 98 | ZHANG Aaron | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 99 | LI Lianhan | 3% | 30% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 99 | PAN Henry | 20% | 47% | 27% | 6% | - | - | |
| 101 | MALHAM Andrew | 15% | 64% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 102 | LIEW Jeremy K. | 1% | 12% | 35% | 37% | 14% | 2% | |
| 103 | LIU Jeremiah | 15% | 44% | 33% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 104 | ZENG Rick | 3% | 25% | 48% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 105 | YE Gavin | 86% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 106 | XU Ethan | - | 8% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 107 | XIE Buster | 7% | 34% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 108 | ONIK Ari N. | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 109 | LEE Eugene | 15% | 50% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 110 | LOGAN Kai | 40% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 111 | VISHAWADIA Jaimin | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 112 | ZHENG LEON | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 113 | WONG Jacob W. | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 114 | SHIN Jiho | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 115 | HOSANAGAR Ninad | 42% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 115 | CHOI Eugene | 82% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 117 | ARIZA Abraham J. | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 118 | ZHANG Teddy | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 118 | BELOKON Sammy | 23% | 39% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 118 | WEI Qian | 51% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 121 | WANG Ralph | 77% | 22% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 122 | HIGGASON Hugh | 56% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 123 | HOPPING Nolan | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 123 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 125 | YANG Hongyu | 7% | 33% | 42% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 126 | ZHANG Lucas | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | - | - |
| 126 | BANG Sian | 43% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.