Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% |
2 | MARX Jackson L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% |
3 | GRAHAM Roy J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% |
3 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
5 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 26% |
6 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% |
7 | CULLIVAN Justice | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% | |
8 | RUSADZE Nickolas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 47% |
9 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 50% |
10 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 58% |
11 | GARCIA Sebastian R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 31% |
12 | DAI Jonathan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 64% |
13 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 17% |
14 | MIALL Steven A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 25% |
15 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 19% | |
16 | LI Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% | |
17 | LEE Jacob J | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 4% |
18 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 17% | |
19 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% |
20 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 35% | 6% | |
21 | GOOR Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 30% |
22 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 10% | |
23 | LEE Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% |
24 | LIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 15% | 1% |
25 | LIU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 10% |
26 | TANG Owen S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 33% | |
26 | LI Yao (Liam) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | |
28 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 13% |
29 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
30 | XIAO Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
31 | YU Jason | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 2% |
32 | NICOLL William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
33 | LI Chenglang Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 29% | 3% |
34 | PO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 17% | |
35 | LIU Derek | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | |
36 | WECHSLER Jacob | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 4% |
37 | LI Jinghua E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
38 | TANG Albert | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
39 | MASTROPAOLO Jonah W. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 16% | 1% | - |
40 | HUANG Eythan | 100% | 86% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
41 | ZHOU Leon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 16% | 1% |
42 | PARK Joseph | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
43 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 22% | 1% |
43 | KOVACS Wyatt | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | 14% | 1% |
43 | HUA Aiden | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - |
46 | GUO Justin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 9% | - |
47 | TANG August L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 8% |
48 | CATINO Brennen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 25% | |
49 | BAO Aaron | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 9% | |
50 | ARICO Trey | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% | 3% | |
51 | SHAO Eric | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 15% | 1% | |
52 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 25% | |
53 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
54 | AROUH Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 24% | 3% |
55 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | - |
56 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
57 | MATSAKH Philip | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
57 | CHUNG Ethan Sheng Xuan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
59 | XIANG Derrick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 21% | 2% |
60 | WANG Winston | 100% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | |
61 | RADOSLAVOV Ivan-Asen | 100% | 91% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
62 | LIU Zixian (Aaron) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
63 | DECORLETO III Andrew (Tripp) J. | 100% | 93% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
64 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
65 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 8% |
66 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 94% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
67 | YAO Bradley | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 34% | 6% | |
68 | WANG Jackson | 100% | 100% | 91% | 57% | 18% | 2% | |
69 | SHEN Mingxuan | 100% | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
70 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% | 20% | 2% |
71 | LI Ayren | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 12% | 1% |
71 | JIA Jing Yu | 100% | 91% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
73 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
74 | SONG Austin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 8% | - |
75 | TANG Alexander L. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
76 | CULHANE Dechen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 10% | |
77 | BOBROW Silas | 100% | 100% | 95% | 60% | 18% | 2% | |
78 | SHIM Peter S. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | 14% | 1% | |
79 | LEWIS Nikhil I. | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | |
80 | WANG Julang | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
81 | LU Guanxun (James) | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
82 | JURMAN Therin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
83 | WANG Mason | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
84 | TAN Aidan | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
85 | TIKHAEV Alexander | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
86 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - |
87 | XU Ethan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
88 | GAO Payton | 100% | 94% | 62% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
89 | CHA James | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - |
90 | ARCE Andrew W. | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
91 | AKYAMAC Bora | 100% | 68% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
92 | WONG Jackson | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 10% | 1% |
93 | BANG Ian | 100% | 42% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
94 | SIMON Luke | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
95 | HE Yuxiang | 100% | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
96 | CAO Ray | 100% | 94% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - | |
97 | RAJ Jay | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
98 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
99 | LI Lianhan | 100% | 97% | 67% | 25% | 4% | - | |
99 | PAN Henry | 100% | 80% | 33% | 6% | - | - | |
101 | MALHAM Andrew | 100% | 85% | 21% | 2% | - | - | |
102 | LIEW Jeremy K. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
103 | LIU Jeremiah | 100% | 85% | 40% | 7% | - | - | - |
104 | ZENG Rick | 100% | 97% | 72% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
105 | YE Gavin | 100% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
106 | XU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
107 | XIE Buster | 100% | 93% | 59% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
108 | ONIK Ari N. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
109 | LEE Eugene | 100% | 85% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - |
110 | LOGAN Kai | 100% | 60% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
111 | VISHAWADIA Jaimin | 100% | 71% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
112 | ZHENG LEON | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
113 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
114 | SHIN Jiho | 100% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
115 | HOSANAGAR Ninad | 100% | 58% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
115 | CHOI Eugene | 100% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | |
117 | ARIZA Abraham J. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
118 | ZHANG Teddy | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
118 | BELOKON Sammy | 100% | 77% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
118 | WEI Qian | 100% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
121 | WANG Ralph | 100% | 23% | 1% | - | - | - | |
122 | HIGGASON Hugh | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
123 | HOPPING Nolan | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
123 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
125 | YANG Hongyu | 100% | 93% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
126 | ZHANG Lucas | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
126 | BANG Sian | 100% | 57% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.