Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | VERMEULE Spencer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% |
| 2 | SZAPARY Tristan B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% |
| 3 | MARAKOV Allen B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 17% |
| 3 | MARCHANT Albert J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 5 | ADLER Ian B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
| 6 | KAMBESELES Peter G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 27% |
| 7 | KANG Michael H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
| 8 | BEDOR William J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 7% |
| 9 | NTONOS Thrasyvoulos (Akis) | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% | |
| 10 | YUROVCHAK Andrew T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 23% |
| 11 | ABDALLAH Ahmed | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
| 12 | SHENG Patrick Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 10% |
| 13 | DIDASKALOU Ilias L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 14 | STUSNICK Hunter | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
| 15 | RA Jr. Daniel M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
| 16 | TAE William G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% |
| 17 | GIBSON Nowell L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 22% |
| 18 | CULLEN Daniel F. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 19 | KAMBESELES Jack M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 20 | MACKIN Samuel | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 21 | SOOMRO Adam A. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 22 | HOLTZ Donovan K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 13% |
| 23 | CHIN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 15% |
| 24 | ZHANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 25 | DECKER Tristan H. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 26 | MAISEL Simon F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
| 27 | LEE Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 28 | ANDREEV Arthur | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 7% |
| 29 | CHERNYSHOV Max | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 30 | LEHR William D. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | SHREM Samuel G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
| 32 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 100% | 90% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 33 | GORDON Reis J. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 34 | ALLEN Graham | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
| 35 | OLIVERIUS Joseph W. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 6% | |
| 36 | ZHANG YuJian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 37 | MORSE Tyler | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 38 | SIDDIQUI HUMZA K. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 39 | BEKKER Mitchel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 16% | 2% |
| 40 | SLAVINSKIY Alan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 25% |
| 41 | PAK Charles | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 42 | ALFAIATE Lucas | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | ROBITZSKI Daniel A. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
| 44 | DAVIS Jeffrey H. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 4% | |
| 45 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 46 | GAMBINO Robert A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 47 | YOON Nathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
| 48 | WU Joseph | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 49 | LIBSON Tazman | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
| 50 | MERCHANT Reza H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 51 | SMITH Nicholas S. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 52 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 74% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | PARK Prestan S. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 54 | DIXON Samuel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 55 | GLAZ Nicholas S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 56 | AGAON Shawn | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 57 | WU Byron | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 58 | LEE Timothy S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
| 59 | CHONG christopher | 100% | 89% | 54% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 60 | RHYU Kozmo | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 28% | 6% |
| 61 | SPANO Gideon S. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 62 | MIRANDA Matteo | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 63 | KIM William M. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% | |
| 64 | PERSAUD Daivik | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 65 | WISNIEWSKI Bart | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 66 | POLSTER Joshua | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 67 | MISHIMA Torata | 100% | 64% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 68 | KOLKER Gregory A. | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 69 | BURKE Cyril | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 70 | HEKMAT Sina R. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 71 | LIU John | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 72 | DIXON Thomas | 100% | 97% | 64% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 73 | LIU Jack | 100% | 96% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 74 | LAI Coby | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 75 | BENKLER Yuriy | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 76 | MAAS Sean H. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 77 | PRADHAN Aryan | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 78 | BASOK Nikita | 100% | 97% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 79 | VERGARA Nicolas M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 79 | ROBERTS Samuel E. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 81 | AYALA Jaime | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 82 | ROWE Jason | 100% | 51% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 83 | BINDAS Odinn A. | 100% | 59% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 84 | LI Jeffrey | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 85 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 86 | STEFANOV Michael A. | 100% | 95% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 87 | SUN Jeffery | 100% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 88 | PARK Vincent | 100% | 89% | 52% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 89 | SUN Jason | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 90 | ALAVOSUS James J. | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.