San Diego, CA - San Diego, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SINGHA Orion | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 2 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | PRASAD Ankith | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 3 | LIN Kyran | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 5 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 6 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 7 | WRIGHT Christopher | V V V V | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 8 | DRIBIN Ezra | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 9 | NOEL Sebastien A. | D V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 10 | WANG DEVON | V V D V V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 11 | BAGCHI Aritra | V V D V V | V D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 12 | JAIN Aditya | V D V V D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 13 | BRUSKOTTER Reiland | V D V D V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 14 | JIN daniel | V D V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 15 | BAZHENOV Anthony | V D D V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 16 | NIKOLOV Peter | V D V V D D | V V D | 0.9 | 3 | +2.1 |
| 17 | PARK Elliot | V V D V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 18 | CHU Allan | D V V D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 19 | ZHANG Alec | D V V D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 20 | MCDONALD Ethan | V V V D D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 21 | GAITHER Christopher W. | D V D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 22 | ZHANG Yuelin | D V D D V V | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 23 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | D V V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 24 | THOMAS Michael | V D D V D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 25 | KIM Nathan | V D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 26 | EVANS noah | V D V D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 27 | GUPTA-GARCIA Raj | D V D V D | V D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 28 | SHA Michael | D V V D D | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 29 | GREGSTON Layland | V D D V D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 31 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | D D D V D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 32 | HIGGINS Branford | D D V D D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 33 | YAO Geoffrey B. | D D D V D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 34 | CASASSOVICI Georges | D D D V D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 35 | MITTLER Frederick | D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 35 | WANG owen | D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 37 | MENDOZA Zander | D D D D D | D | 3.0 | 0 | -3.0 |
| 38 | SINHA Zaan | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 39 | KIM Sullivan | D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 40 | RAINEY Daniel | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 41 | PHUKAN Rohin | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 42 | KNUDSEN Travis | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.