San Diego, CA - San Diego, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SINGHA Orion | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 35% | |
| 2 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 41% | |
| 3 | PRASAD Ankith | - | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 70% |
| 3 | LIN Kyran | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 34% | |
| 5 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | - | - | 6% | 26% | 44% | 25% | |
| 6 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | - | - | 1% | 8% | 43% | 48% | |
| 7 | WRIGHT Christopher | 1% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 13% | ||
| 8 | DRIBIN Ezra | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 2% |
| 9 | NOEL Sebastien A. | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | |
| 10 | WANG DEVON | 1% | 17% | 40% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
| 11 | BAGCHI Aritra | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 12 | JAIN Aditya | - | - | 3% | 21% | 49% | 27% | |
| 13 | BRUSKOTTER Reiland | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 14 | JIN daniel | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
| 15 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 1% | 8% | 32% | 42% | 18% | ||
| 16 | NIKOLOV Peter | 35% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 17 | PARK Elliot | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 6% | |
| 18 | CHU Allan | 1% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 12% | 1% | |
| 19 | ZHANG Alec | 1% | 12% | 39% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
| 20 | MCDONALD Ethan | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | |
| 21 | GAITHER Christopher W. | 2% | 18% | 40% | 33% | 7% | ||
| 22 | ZHANG Yuelin | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 2% |
| 23 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | 3% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 6% | ||
| 24 | THOMAS Michael | 8% | 32% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 25 | KIM Nathan | 1% | 12% | 35% | 37% | 13% | 1% | |
| 26 | EVANS noah | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | |
| 27 | GUPTA-GARCIA Raj | 38% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 28 | SHA Michael | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | GREGSTON Layland | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | - |
| 31 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | 11% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 32 | HIGGINS Branford | 1% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 1% | |
| 33 | YAO Geoffrey B. | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 6% | |
| 34 | CASASSOVICI Georges | 1% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 1% | |
| 35 | MITTLER Frederick | 14% | 40% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | WANG owen | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 37 | MENDOZA Zander | < 1% | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
| 38 | SINHA Zaan | 75% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 39 | KIM Sullivan | 57% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | ||
| 40 | RAINEY Daniel | 23% | 48% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 41 | PHUKAN Rohin | 20% | 43% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | KNUDSEN Travis | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.