Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DESERANNO Jeidus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 50% |
| 2 | BAS Liam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% |
| 3 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 31% |
| 3 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% | |
| 5 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% |
| 6 | LAURICELLA Douglas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 10% |
| 7 | WU Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% |
| 8 | KWON Ethan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 9 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
| 10 | HONDA Kazu Z. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 11 | CHEN Allen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 9% |
| 12 | KASI Sanjay | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 15% |
| 13 | STANLEY Mason B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% |
| 14 | MITCHELL Philip D. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 14 | LI Jiaan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
| 16 | SINGH Dayaal | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% | 21% | ||
| 17 | ZHANG Henry C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% |
| 18 | ZHANG Andy W. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 10% | |
| 19 | LEE Aidan | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 20 | JEON Caleb A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 12% | |
| 21 | PELOSKY Zack B. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | 20% | ||
| 22 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 23 | KOBAL Maximilian | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 24 | KIM Brandon J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 6% |
| 25 | WEN George C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
| 26 | DU Samuel R. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
| 27 | SONG Dylan S. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 28 | AHN Jun | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 29 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% | 22% | ||
| 30 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 31 | BUERGIN Aidan | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 32 | WU Alexander | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 33 | HUTH Mitchell | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 34 | BREIER Matthew F. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 2% | |
| 35 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
| 36 | BAE Kevin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 37 | SHA Yi Peng | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 38 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% |
| 39 | WU Jerry | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 40 | BELLUOMO David C. | 100% | 97% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 41 | LE Vyn A. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 42 | ZHAO Jason L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% | |
| 43 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% | |
| 44 | WU Alexander | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 11% | |
| 45 | SCHENCK Koen M. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% | |
| 46 | FU Samuel Y. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
| 48 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% |
| 49 | TIAN Aaron C. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 50 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 51 | SONG Aiden S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | |
| 52 | FREEDMAN Samuel E. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
| 53 | GATZA Logan | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 53 | GRAHAM Roy J. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% | |
| 55 | LI Richard | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | |
| 56 | CHEN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 57 | DAI Jonathan T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 57 | SICHITIU Alexander | 100% | 99% | 85% | 53% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 59 | KULKARNI Ansh A. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 60 | CHUNG Noah J. | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 61 | PAE Jonathan L. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
| 62 | LI Matthew | 100% | 81% | 44% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 63 | YU Jonathan J. | 100% | 66% | 15% | 1% | - | ||
| 64 | LIU Eric Y. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 65 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 66 | WECHSLER Jacob | 100% | 89% | 49% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 67 | GAO William | 100% | 57% | 10% | 1% | - | ||
| 68 | BRUK Peter J. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
| 69 | BING Charles | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 70 | NAGER Noah | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 71 | OH SEAN | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 72 | TAN Christien | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | RUSADZE Nickolas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 74 | LOVE Aaron | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 75 | TSAI Max W. | 100% | 96% | 67% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 76 | TORRES Treston | 100% | 87% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 77 | MARX Oscar L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 77 | KNIZHNIK David | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 79 | DRESSEL Jet | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 80 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
| 81 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 82 | PAE Brian L. | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 83 | LIN Michael | 100% | 76% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 84 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 76% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 85 | TSIMMERMAN Michael | 100% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 85 | ADAMS Cyrus | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.