Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | - | 3% | 23% | 47% | 27% | |
| 2 | WIMMER Chandler M. | - | 4% | 24% | 47% | 25% | |
| 3 | KIM Ethan J. | - | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% | |
| 3 | JEYOON Ryan S. | 1% | 11% | 42% | 37% | 9% | |
| 5 | PARK Ian C. | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 40% | 13% |
| 6 | TRIMMER Colin | 3% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 6% | |
| 7 | JIN Owen | - | 11% | 37% | 40% | 12% | |
| 8 | CHO Tyler H. | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 38% | |
| 9 | LEE Shwan | 1% | 13% | 37% | 38% | 12% | |
| 10 | CHEN Eric | 1% | 26% | 45% | 24% | 4% | |
| 11 | CHAWLA Armaan | 1% | 10% | 35% | 42% | 11% | |
| 12 | RHYU Kozmo | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% |
| 13 | JAMES Samuel | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 9% |
| 14 | YOON Nathan | - | 7% | 28% | 42% | 22% | |
| 15 | WALKER IV Weymouth D. | - | 7% | 29% | 44% | 20% | |
| 16 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 2% | 27% | 44% | 23% | 4% | |
| 17 | LI Benjamin | - | 9% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 2% |
| 18 | TAE William G. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
| 19 | GATZA Logan | - | 4% | 24% | 45% | 26% | |
| 20 | SHARMA Sanil | - | 3% | 18% | 46% | 34% | |
| 21 | O'HARA Keegan J. | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% | |
| 22 | SHIV Rishi | 7% | 34% | 39% | 17% | 2% | |
| 23 | RUSSANOV Dennis | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 33% |
| 24 | WANG Tristan | 1% | 15% | 48% | 30% | 7% | - |
| 25 | LEONE III Charles D. | 1% | 16% | 40% | 34% | 9% | |
| 26 | LEE Kennith | 14% | 54% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 27 | PARK Vincent | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 28 | KIM Dylan J. | 12% | 40% | 36% | 11% | 1% | |
| 29 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | 7% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 4% | |
| 30 | CHONG christopher | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% |
| 31 | SCHULZE Ethan | 19% | 55% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | KING Cameron | 1% | 21% | 44% | 28% | 5% | |
| 33 | MURPHY Thomas P. | 4% | 36% | 42% | 17% | 2% | |
| 34 | MORSE Tyler | - | - | 9% | 36% | 41% | 13% |
| 35 | JOSEPH William | - | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
| 36 | KROPP Jack | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% |
| 37 | JUNG Minche | 1% | 24% | 45% | 25% | 4% | |
| 38 | CLICK Aiden | 1% | 17% | 42% | 32% | 8% | |
| 39 | SJOSTEDT Jacob H. | - | 1% | 13% | 42% | 43% | |
| 40 | LEE Timothy S. | - | 11% | 38% | 40% | 11% | |
| 41 | VALES Keyan | 19% | 47% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 42 | STEVENS Daniel | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | |
| 43 | HORTELANO Ethan | 2% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 9% | |
| 44 | PARK Jong-Eun | - | 6% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 4% |
| 45 | LEE Daniel Y. | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
| 46 | VACCARO Dominick J. | 57% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | HERMANSON David B. | 6% | 30% | 43% | 19% | 2% | |
| 48 | NOMANI Shibli D. | 2% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 9% | |
| 49 | DOAN Joseph M. | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% | |
| 50 | SHAH S Ayush | - | 3% | 23% | 47% | 27% | |
| 51 | FU Ethan | 41% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | GOLDER Will W. | 4% | 24% | 45% | 24% | 4% | |
| 53 | ZHANG Caden | 88% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 54 | USDIN Anton | 9% | 43% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 55 | SCHAPIRO Jacob | 50% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | SINGH Aryaman | 42% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 57 | CHOI Marcus | 67% | 29% | 3% | - | - | |
| 57 | ZHANG Richard | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | LAM Bill | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | |
| 60 | ZHANG Andy | 86% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 61 | BANNEN Nicholas | 17% | 48% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 62 | LEE JoonWon | 63% | 34% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 62 | WANG Trontour | 65% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.