University of Maryland Retriever Activity Center (RAC) - Catonsville, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | NORTH Gary S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
2 | DOSS David A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 57% |
3 | SHELANSKI Isaac | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% |
3 | LEE Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 23% |
5 | GERAGHTY Michael P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
6 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
7 | HRAPSKY Ryan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
8 | SCHWARTZ Elliott | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 8% | |
9 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 31% |
10 | CHAWLA Armaan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
11 | WOZNIAK Fryderyk | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
12 | WILCOX Alexander | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
13 | RHYU Kozmo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 15% |
14 | SCHULZE Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
15 | CAO Albert | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - |
16 | LEE Samuel Y. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% | - |
17 | DOAN Joseph M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
18 | WRIGHT Ezra B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% |
19 | DICKENS Robert W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 31% |
20 | GAO Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 5% |
21 | CAO Brad | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - |
22 | SAFKO Jeffrey A. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
23 | ANDREWS Iain | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
24 | JIN Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 18% |
25 | DUAN eric | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
26 | ZHANG Richard | 100% | 53% | 10% | 1% | < 1% | - | - |
27 | WOZNIAK Ignacy | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
28 | KING Cameron | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
29 | LEE Shwan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 4% |
30 | NORTH Alexander M. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
31 | WALTHER Bryan M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 5% |
32 | TIRRELL Justin J. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
33 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 7% |
34 | GRUPP Tristan E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 12% |
35 | WU Byron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 28% | 3% |
36 | ZIMINSKY Karel M. | 100% | 97% | 68% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
37 | KUCZAJDA Matthew | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
38 | USDIN Anton | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
39 | HANSEN Lars | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
40 | WANG Clayton | 100% | 97% | 72% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
41 | DUDLEY Logan M. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
42 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 5% | - |
43 | LAM Bill | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
44 | O'HARROW Tristan C. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
45 | WANG Trontour | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | |
46 | EVANS Allen L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 35% | 6% | - |
47 | WANG Tristan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
48 | CHEN Wesley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 12% | 1% |
49 | JONES Tyler | 100% | 90% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
50 | GUIMIOT Henri | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
51 | AYMETT Robert (Skip) S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 20% | 3% |
52 | KWOUN Miles S. | 100% | 90% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
53 | PAN Colin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - |
54 | LIN Harrison | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
55 | CHEN Chang-Rung | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% | 1% |
56 | WOLFE Alex | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
57 | BYUN Andrew | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
57 | MARSH Alex | 100% | 42% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
59 | JANG Elliot | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - |
60 | SINGH Aryaman | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
61 | SU Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% |
62 | WATERFIELD Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
63 | MILLER Kurt | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
64 | LEE Joonwon | 100% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
65 | HERMAN Nathan | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
66 | SIMS Martin L. | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
67 | EHRGOTT Christian | 100% | 86% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
68 | FINCH Parker | 100% | 91% | 52% | 6% | - | - | - |
69 | FLORES Jonathan | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.