Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | DODIN David | V V V D V | V V V V V V | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
2 | KATS Dylan G. | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
3 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
3 | TIYA BIAYA K. | V V D V V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
5 | LEE inwoo | V V V V V V | V V V D | 2.8 | 6 | +3.2 |
6 | IARIKOV Nicholas | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
7 | KIM Nathan | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
8 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | V V D D V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
9 | SHCHUR Landon | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
10 | LEE Samuel Y. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
11 | SKORUPAN Grant | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
12 | SILVERS Ari | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
13 | YAO Geoffrey B. | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
14 | ZHENG Andy | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
15 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | V D V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
16 | WOLFE Alex | D V D D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
17 | MULCAHY Olaf | V V V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
18 | SU Caleb | V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
19 | LOISEAU Eliott | D V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
20 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
21 | KHANNA Nikhil | V D V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
22 | PARK Nicholas | V V V D V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
23 | SANTOS Antonio K. | D V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
24 | NAKAS Levent | V V D V V D | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
25 | CHIN Dylan A. | V V V D D V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
25 | HEADRICK Lance | V V V D D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
27 | KENT V David | D V V V D V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
28 | LO Jake | D V V D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
29 | KARNAS Karol | V D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
30 | RIPA Joseph K. | V D D V D V | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
31 | HERNDON Liam | V D V V D D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
32 | SONG Troy | V D V V D D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
33 | LAI Boden | V D V V V | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
34 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | D D V V V V | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 | |
35 | MALHAM Andrew | V D V V D V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
36 | SINGH Ravin | V V V V D D | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
37 | MILLER Quinlan | D V V V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
38 | VRAPI Dorian A. | V V D V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
39 | SANTOS Francisco M. | V V D D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
40 | RATUSHNYI Georgii | V V V D D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
41 | YU Austin | D V V V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
42 | GINZBURG Adam | D V V D V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
43 | FENG shang | V D D V V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
44 | ZHENG Jerry | V V V D D D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
45 | DONAHUE Lake | D V V D V D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
46 | FRANGER Max | V V V D D D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
47 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | D V V D D V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
48 | JONES Reilly | D V D V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
49 | MAO Benjamin | V V D D V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
50 | XIONG Aaron | D V V D D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
50 | KIM Tae | D V D D V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
52 | GONZALEZ Kian | D V D V D V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
53 | XIE Brandon | V V D D D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
54 | BRODSKY Julian | V D D V V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
55 | CHEN Zhengyang | D D D V V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
56 | CLICK Tristan | D V V D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
57 | KIM Jayden | D D V D V | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
58 | ERLIKHMAN Adrian | D D V D V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
59 | ROMANOV Ethan | D D D V V D | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
60 | ESKRIDGE Caleb | D D D D V V | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
61 | DONDISCH ilan | D D D D V V | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
62 | VYSOTSKIY Evan | V D D D V D | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
63 | TRULL A.J. | D V D V D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
64 | MIAO KUNQI | D D D V D V | V D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
65 | MAXU Tiger | V D D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
66 | SAUNIER Cameron | D D D V V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
66 | GONZALEZ Aaron M | D V D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
68 | ZENG Andrew | D D V V D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
69 | BORISENKO Samuel | D V D V D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
70 | STAUDINGER Enzo | D D D V D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
71 | GUO Lucas | D D D V V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
72 | PAVLENISHVILI Luke | D D V D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
73 | LU Nathan | V D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
74 | WANG Joey | D D V D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
75 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | D V D D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
76 | DHAL Leon | V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
77 | RUSSELL Michael | D D D D V D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
78 | CHUTKAY Sai Pratham | D V D D D D | 3.9 | 1 | -2.9 | |
79 | MANGAN Hunter | D D D V D D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 | |
80 | DODDAPANENI Aarav | V D D D D D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 | |
81 | ALI Farhan | D D D V D D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 | |
82 | SOKOL Luke | V D D D D D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 | |
83 | OLSON Joseph | V D D D D D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 | |
84 | XIA Richard | D D V D D D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 | |
85 | LAM Alan | D D D D D D | 2.8 | 0 | -2.8 | |
86 | TAI Edison | D D D D D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 | |
87 | LEE DoWon | D D D D D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 | |
88 | BRADSHAW Carter | D D D D D D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 | |
89 | MEHROTRA Neel | D D D D D D | 3.4 | 0 | -3.4 | |
90 | SIEDOW William | D D D D D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 | |
91 | BAKKEN Archer | D D D D D D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 | |
92 | AYOTTE James | D D D D D D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 | |
93 | LOISEAU Oscar | D D D D D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 | |
94 | SCHAFF Wolfgang W. | D D D D D D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.