National Championships, Junior Olympic Championships & July NAC

Y-12 Men's Épée

Friday, July 9, 2021 at 1:00 PM

Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 DODIN David - - 6% 25% 43% 26%
2 KATS Dylan G. - - - - 1% 15% 84%
3 WIMMER Nathaniel P. - - - - 5% 32% 63%
3 TIYA BIAYA K. - - - 5% 30% 65%
5 LEE inwoo 1% 11% 28% 33% 20% 6% 1%
6 IARIKOV Nicholas - - 1% 6% 22% 41% 30%
7 KIM Nathan - 1% 10% 33% 41% 16%
8 ZAYDMAN Ethan - - 2% 9% 28% 40% 21%
9 SHCHUR Landon - - - 2% 14% 42% 42%
10 LEE Samuel Y. - - 1% 5% 22% 43% 28%
11 SKORUPAN Grant - - 4% 17% 35% 33% 11%
12 SILVERS Ari - 1% 5% 18% 34% 31% 11%
13 YAO Geoffrey B. - - 1% 9% 27% 41% 21%
14 ZHENG Andy - - 2% 13% 34% 39% 13%
15 TIKHOMIROV Theodore - 3% 15% 33% 35% 13%
16 WOLFE Alex - 1% 7% 22% 35% 26% 8%
17 MULCAHY Olaf - - 1% 8% 29% 43% 20%
18 SU Caleb - - 1% 8% 35% 57%
19 LOISEAU Eliott - 1% 7% 21% 34% 28% 9%
20 CHIMOSKEY Finn D. - - 2% 11% 31% 40% 16%
21 KHANNA Nikhil - - 1% 6% 25% 44% 25%
22 PARK Nicholas - - 1% 10% 36% 43% 10%
23 SANTOS Antonio K. - 3% 14% 32% 35% 15% 1%
24 NAKAS Levent - 1% 6% 23% 39% 25% 5%
25 CHIN Dylan A. - 4% 17% 31% 30% 15% 3%
25 HEADRICK Lance - 5% 18% 33% 29% 12% 2%
27 KENT V David 2% 14% 33% 33% 14% 3% -
28 LO Jake - 2% 12% 31% 38% 17%
29 KARNAS Karol 1% 8% 26% 39% 23% 3%
30 RIPA Joseph K. 9% 30% 35% 19% 5% 1% -
31 HERNDON Liam 7% 31% 39% 19% 3% - -
32 SONG Troy 3% 15% 31% 32% 16% 3% -
33 LAI Boden 7% 27% 39% 22% 5% -
34 DAVOODIAN Christopher - - 2% 11% 31% 38% 18%
35 MALHAM Andrew 1% 7% 23% 36% 26% 7% -
36 SINGH Ravin 5% 20% 34% 28% 12% 2% -
37 MILLER Quinlan - 5% 24% 39% 25% 5%
38 VRAPI Dorian A. 3% 18% 36% 31% 11% 1%
39 SANTOS Francisco M. 6% 24% 36% 25% 8% 1%
40 RATUSHNYI Georgii 5% 24% 38% 26% 7% -
41 YU Austin 6% 23% 36% 26% 9% 1%
42 GINZBURG Adam - 5% 20% 35% 29% 10% 1%
43 FENG shang 1% 11% 28% 35% 20% 5% -
44 ZHENG Jerry 2% 12% 29% 34% 19% 5% -
45 DONAHUE Lake 10% 30% 35% 19% 5% 1% -
46 FRANGER Max 2% 15% 33% 32% 14% 2% -
47 ARMSTRONG TyLee 19% 39% 29% 10% 2% - -
48 JONES Reilly 1% 9% 26% 34% 23% 7% 1%
49 MAO Benjamin 4% 20% 34% 28% 11% 2% -
50 XIONG Aaron 2% 13% 33% 35% 15% 3% -
50 KIM Tae 1% 8% 28% 40% 21% 4% -
52 GONZALEZ Kian - 1% 7% 28% 42% 20% 2%
53 XIE Brandon - 4% 19% 35% 30% 10% 1%
54 BRODSKY Julian - 3% 13% 30% 33% 18% 4%
55 CHEN Zhengyang 3% 16% 35% 32% 12% 1%
56 CLICK Tristan 8% 29% 37% 20% 5% -
57 KIM Jayden - 3% 16% 38% 36% 7%
58 ERLIKHMAN Adrian 3% 17% 33% 30% 14% 3% -
59 ROMANOV Ethan - 1% 8% 24% 36% 25% 6%
60 ESKRIDGE Caleb - 1% 7% 23% 36% 26% 7%
61 DONDISCH ilan 33% 42% 20% 4% - - -
62 VYSOTSKIY Evan - 3% 14% 29% 32% 18% 4%
63 TRULL A.J. 1% 10% 27% 33% 22% 7% 1%
64 MIAO KUNQI 43% 39% 15% 3% - - -
65 MAXU Tiger 11% 32% 35% 17% 4% -
66 SAUNIER Cameron 1% 13% 37% 35% 13% 2%
66 GONZALEZ Aaron M 7% 28% 38% 22% 5% -
68 ZENG Andrew 14% 35% 33% 15% 3% - -
69 BORISENKO Samuel 7% 25% 36% 24% 8% 1% -
70 STAUDINGER Enzo 7% 28% 36% 22% 6% 1% -
71 GUO Lucas 3% 19% 37% 30% 10% 1% -
72 PAVLENISHVILI Luke 5% 26% 38% 23% 6% 1% -
73 LU Nathan 7% 24% 35% 24% 9% 1% -
74 WANG Joey 6% 22% 34% 26% 10% 2% -
75 VEERAVALLI Vivek 2% 14% 32% 33% 16% 3% -
76 DHAL Leon 8% 41% 37% 13% 2% -
77 RUSSELL Michael 3% 16% 32% 31% 15% 3% -
78 CHUTKAY Sai Pratham - 1% 9% 25% 35% 23% 6%
79 MANGAN Hunter 43% 40% 14% 2% - - -
80 DODDAPANENI Aarav 13% 37% 35% 13% 2% - -
81 ALI Farhan 26% 41% 24% 7% 1% - -
82 SOKOL Luke - 4% 19% 35% 31% 10% -
83 OLSON Joseph 7% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1% -
84 XIA Richard 32% 44% 20% 3% - - -
85 LAM Alan 1% 10% 29% 35% 19% 4% -
86 TAI Edison 5% 22% 36% 27% 9% 1%
87 LEE DoWon 21% 41% 29% 9% 1% -
88 BRADSHAW Carter 31% 43% 21% 4% - - -
89 MEHROTRA Neel < 1% 4% 17% 31% 30% 15% 3%
90 SIEDOW William 63% 32% 5% - - -
91 BAKKEN Archer 12% 38% 36% 12% 1% - -
92 AYOTTE James 7% 27% 36% 22% 7% 1% -
93 LOISEAU Oscar 26% 42% 25% 6% 1% -
94 SCHAFF Wolfgang W. 32% 42% 21% 5% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.