Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 29% |
2 | CHEN Eric | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
3 | LEE Shwan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 8% |
3 | SU Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 20% |
5 | STEVENS Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 18% |
6 | DUAN eric | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
7 | LEE Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% |
8 | PARK Ian C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% |
9 | KIM Ethan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
10 | WOZNIAK Ignacy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 27% |
11 | JEYOON Ryan S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | |
12 | CHAWLA Armaan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 6% | |
13 | TREBON Hayden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 6% |
14 | KING Cameron | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
15 | MURPHY Thomas P. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
16 | KROPP Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 34% | |
17 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 11% |
18 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 12% |
19 | CAO Brad | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
20 | SHIV Rishi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
21 | LEE Samuel Y. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
22 | KIM Dylan J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
23 | JOSEPH William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 13% | |
24 | O'CONNOR Riley | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
25 | VALES Keyan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 7% | - |
26 | WOZNIAK Fryderyk | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
27 | WOLFE Alex | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 13% | 1% | |
28 | LEONE III Charles D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 20% |
29 | VACCARO Dominick J. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
30 | LEE JoonWon | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
31 | KIM Ryan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
32 | CHAMBLISS Logan C. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
33 | PARK Vincent | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
34 | JANG Elliot | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
35 | CAO Albert | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
36 | NORTH Alexander M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
37 | CLICK Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% |
38 | KWOUN Miles S. | 100% | 92% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
39 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
40 | WANG Trontour | 100% | 83% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
41 | MODULLA Yathin | 100% | 68% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
42 | JORDAN Anton | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - |
43 | ZHANG Andy | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
44 | ZHANG Caden | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
44 | DAVIS Jonah | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
46 | BERNARD Jack B. | 100% | 67% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
47 | MILLER Kurt | 100% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
48 | MING Isaac | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
49 | JUNG Minche | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 2% | |
50 | CRANE Matthew T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
50 | LAM Bill | 100% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
52 | JONES Tyler | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
53 | POIST Wylie | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
54 | LIN Harrison | 100% | 82% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
55 | SINFUEGO Adrian | 100% | 79% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
56 | ILYAS Zakariya | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
57 | FU Ethan | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
58 | SLOUGH Sean | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - |
59 | BANNEN Nicholas | 100% | 83% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
60 | PALAMARCHUK Matthew | 100% | 63% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
61 | COREY Colin | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.