Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PARK Ian C. | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
| 2 | JEYOON Ryan S. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 40% | 28% |
| 3 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
| 3 | LEE Samuel Y. | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 5 | WOZNIAK Fryderyk | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 6 | MURPHY Thomas P. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 4% |
| 7 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 44% | 21% |
| 8 | CAO Brad | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 9 | KROPP Jack | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% |
| 10 | LEE Daniel Y. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% |
| 11 | O'CONNOR Riley | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 12 | NORTH Alexander M. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 13 | BERNARD Jack B. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 14 | CHONG christopher | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
| 15 | CHEN Eric | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% |
| 16 | CAO Albert | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
| 17 | LEE Shwan | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% |
| 18 | SU Caleb | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 31% |
| 19 | JONES Tyler | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 1% |
| 20 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 21 | WANG Clayton | - | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 22 | LEONE III Charles D. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 68% |
| 23 | CHAMBLISS Logan C. | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 24 | CHAWLA Armaan | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
| 25 | WANG Trontour | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | LIN Harrison | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 27 | KWOUN Miles S. | 3% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 28 | SINFUEGO Adrian | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 29 | LEE JoonWon | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 30 | JANG Elliot | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
| 31 | KIM Dylan J. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 34% | 8% |
| 32 | JACKSON James | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 33 | WOLFE Alex | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 34 | TREBON Hayden | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% |
| 34 | POIST Wylie | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 36 | DUAN eric | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 5% |
| 37 | VACCARO Dominick J. | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 38 | USDIN Anton | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 39 | ILYAS Zakariya | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 40 | DAVIS Jonah | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 41 | BECK James | 10% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | HEADRICK Lance | 4% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 43 | PALAMARCHUK Matthew | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 44 | GANTSOUDES Isaac | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 45 | JORDAN Anton | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 46 | FU Ethan | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 47 | BANNEN Nicholas | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 48 | SINGH Aryaman | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 49 | MADANI Faris | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 50 | MODULLA Yathin | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 51 | ZHANG Caden | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 52 | MARGHUB Safi | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 52 | MING Isaac | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | CHEN Brian | 7% | 33% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 55 | PENHOET Adrien E. | 50% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 56 | GRENKE Wyatt | 24% | 51% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 57 | PENNINGTON digges | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 58 | TIRADO Giancarlo | 48% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 59 | ZHANG Richard | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 60 | CHENH Justin | 39% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 61 | PETRUNKO Kyrylo | 17% | 41% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | ZHANG Andy | 28% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | RUIZ Jayden | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.