Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YOUNG Peyton E. | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 45% | 37% |
| 2 | HE Lawrence | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
| 3 | LEVITSKY Jonathan | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 5% | |
| 3 | WU Joseph | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 41% | 48% |
| 5 | JIN Nicholas | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 27% |
| 6 | GAO Daniel | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 13% | ||
| 7 | SINGHA Orion | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% | ||
| 8 | JAIN Sarthak | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 12% | |
| 9 | LIN Kyran | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
| 10 | HIGGINS Branford | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | |
| 11 | KIM Benjamin I. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 12 | ZHU Max | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 13 | KIM Darius H. | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 14 | GALLO James | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 11% |
| 15 | PHUKAN Rohin | - | - | 4% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 8% |
| 16 | GREEN Jabreel | - | 6% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 4% | |
| 17 | MCDONALD Ethan | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 18 | JONES Caleb | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
| 19 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 34% | 8% |
| 20 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 21 | LI Patrick | - | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 42% | 15% |
| 22 | WANG DEVON | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 23 | WANG owen | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 24 | KOPPE Alexander | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 25 | SHA Michael | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 26 | ULINICH Alexander | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 3% | |
| 27 | PARK Elliot | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | |
| 28 | JIN daniel | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 15% | |
| 29 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 41% | 28% | |
| 30 | WARD Edward | - | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 45% | 15% |
| 31 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 32 | MOSES Alexander | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% | |
| 33 | MENDOZA Zachari | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 40% | 13% |
| 34 | ZHUANG William | 3% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% | |
| 35 | CHU Allan | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
| 36 | DRIBIN Ezra | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 37 | SARKAR agniv | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% |
| 38 | KNUDSEN Travis | 1% | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 39 | BRUSKOTTER Reiland | 6% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 3% | ||
| 40 | WATT Darren | 12% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 41 | BAGCHI Aritra | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 42 | FU Leon | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 43 | HARR Carver | - | 1% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 1% |
| 44 | HALL Gabriel | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 45 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 5% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 45 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 30% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 47 | XU Alex | 2% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 47 | ARUN Madhav | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 49 | ZHENG Haoran | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 50 | QUITORIANO Jonathan | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 51 | SARKAR Anish | 2% | 17% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 52 | YUEN Nathan | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | PRAKASH Hari | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | HINTON Evan | 71% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | FERDOWSIAN Samuel A | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 56 | PAK Elliot | 8% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 57 | AYABINA JR John | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 58 | INIGO Ian | 14% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | ||
| 59 | MULCAHY Olaf | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | |
| 60 | LEE Chun Po | 8% | 36% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 61 | GAO Chaney C. | 24% | 45% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | BURLING Trenor | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 63 | DAO Alexander | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 64 | MILSTEIN Nikolas | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 65 | MIAO KUNQI | 33% | 44% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 66 | JU Hanul | 2% | 14% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 67 | KIM Sullivan | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 68 | FERRIERE Joshua | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
| 69 | LIM Matthew T. | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 70 | YAO Derek (Shunyu) | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 71 | GU Aidan | 7% | 26% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 72 | MENDOZA Zander | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 73 | ZHANG Andrew | 6% | 46% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | MAJAM Audie | 33% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 75 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | 3% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 76 | ZHANG Nathan | 25% | 47% | 23% | 4% | - | ||
| 77 | LIU Yikun | 33% | 41% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 78 | ROBERTS Tyler | 13% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.