Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YOUNG Peyton E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% |
| 2 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 29% |
| 3 | LEVITSKY Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 32% | 5% | |
| 3 | WU Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% |
| 5 | JIN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% |
| 6 | GAO Daniel | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 13% | ||
| 7 | SINGHA Orion | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% | ||
| 8 | JAIN Sarthak | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 12% | |
| 9 | LIN Kyran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
| 10 | HIGGINS Branford | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 10% | |
| 11 | KIM Benjamin I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 12 | ZHU Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
| 13 | KIM Darius H. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 14 | GALLO James | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 15 | PHUKAN Rohin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 8% |
| 16 | GREEN Jabreel | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 29% | 4% | |
| 17 | MCDONALD Ethan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
| 18 | JONES Caleb | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
| 19 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | 8% |
| 20 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 21 | LI Patrick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 15% |
| 22 | WANG DEVON | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
| 23 | WANG owen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 7% | - |
| 24 | KOPPE Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 25 | SHA Michael | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 26 | ULINICH Alexander | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 3% | |
| 27 | PARK Elliot | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
| 28 | JIN daniel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% | |
| 29 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% | |
| 30 | WARD Edward | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 15% |
| 31 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
| 32 | MOSES Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 48% | |
| 33 | MENDOZA Zachari | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 13% |
| 34 | ZHUANG William | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
| 35 | CHU Allan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 5% | |
| 36 | DRIBIN Ezra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
| 37 | SARKAR agniv | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 36% | 7% |
| 38 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 39 | BRUSKOTTER Reiland | 100% | 94% | 64% | 23% | 3% | ||
| 40 | WATT Darren | 100% | 88% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | BAGCHI Aritra | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 42 | FU Leon | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 43 | HARR Carver | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 15% | 1% |
| 44 | HALL Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 35% | 8% |
| 45 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 100% | 95% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 45 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 100% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 47 | XU Alex | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 12% | 1% | |
| 47 | ARUN Madhav | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 49 | ZHENG Haoran | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 50 | QUITORIANO Jonathan | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | SARKAR Anish | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 52 | YUEN Nathan | 100% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | PRAKASH Hari | 100% | 80% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | HINTON Evan | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | FERDOWSIAN Samuel A | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 56 | PAK Elliot | 100% | 92% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 57 | AYABINA JR John | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 58 | INIGO Ian | 100% | 86% | 50% | 15% | 2% | ||
| 59 | MULCAHY Olaf | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% | |
| 60 | LEE Chun Po | 100% | 92% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 61 | GAO Chaney C. | 100% | 76% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | BURLING Trenor | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 63 | DAO Alexander | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 64 | MILSTEIN Nikolas | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 65 | MIAO KUNQI | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 66 | JU Hanul | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 67 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 68 | FERRIERE Joshua | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 22% | 3% | |
| 69 | LIM Matthew T. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 70 | YAO Derek (Shunyu) | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 71 | GU Aidan | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 72 | MENDOZA Zander | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 73 | ZHANG Andrew | 100% | 94% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | MAJAM Audie | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 75 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 76 | ZHANG Nathan | 100% | 75% | 27% | 4% | - | ||
| 77 | LIU Yikun | 100% | 67% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 78 | ROBERTS Tyler | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.