The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHENG Haoran | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
2 | YAO Geoffrey B. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% | |
3 | KIM Benjamin I. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
3 | STRAUSS Luke | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% |
5 | LIU Andrew | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 40% | 17% |
6 | GARRETT Samuel | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% |
7 | LOWE-THORPE Tyler | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
8 | SHUR Yakov C. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 41% | 31% |
9 | ZHANG Alec | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 13% |
10 | PALLI Maximillian | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
11 | WEAVER Neil | - | - | 4% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 10% |
12 | LUCERO-OLSON Aydin | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
13 | LOGUE Ethan D. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
14 | BRUSKOTTER Reiland | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
15 | CHU Allan | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
16 | PHUKAN Rohin | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
17 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
18 | WATT Darren | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
19 | SINHA Zaan | 2% | 17% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
20 | STCLAIR Jake | 1% | 8% | 22% | 32% | 25% | 10% | 2% |
21 | KUO Elvin | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
22 | AU Marcus J. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% |
23 | LO Jake | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
24 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
25 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% | |
26 | ULINICH Alexander | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
27 | ZHANG Nathan | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
28 | SARKAR Agniv | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
29 | DOWDELL Riley | 2% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
30 | LIU Felix | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 6% |
31 | WONG Nathan | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
32 | ZHUANG William | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
33 | AHMED Saheer | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% | |
34 | ZACHES Torrey | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
35 | SARKAR Anish | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
36 | KNUDSEN Travis | 5% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
37 | ZAYDMAN David M. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 5% |
38 | ANGADALA Leela Krishna | 1% | 13% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
39 | SIVAGAR Leo | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 17% |
40 | PAK Elliot | 8% | 34% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
41 | WONG Kevin | - | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
42 | GUPTA Karan | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
42 | KIM Sullivan | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
44 | BAGCHI Aritra | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
45 | MING Nathan | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | |
46 | WANG owen | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
47 | BURLING Trenor | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | |
48 | BHARGAV Siddharth | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
49 | WRIGHT Christopher | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
50 | PRAKASH Hari | 3% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
51 | LOMIO Nicholas A. | 14% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
52 | BHARGAV Angad | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
53 | CASTELLY Luke | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
54 | KUO Rylan | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
55 | BARNETT Devin | 23% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
56 | WILLIS Alan | 6% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
57 | WONG Ethan | 67% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
58 | CHEN Bailey | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
59 | YU Austin | 15% | 35% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
60 | ARUN Madhav | 4% | 31% | 39% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
61 | YUEN Nathan | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
62 | LAI Aaron | 44% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
63 | BHATT Arjun | 18% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
64 | FINE Gabriel C. | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
65 | MILSTEIN Nikolas | 51% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
66 | CHAKRAVARTHY Arjun | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
67 | LAU Christian | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
68 | LOFTUS Luca | 3% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.