The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Benjamin I. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 2 | ZHENG Haoran | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% |
| 3 | ZHANG Alec | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
| 3 | HUSSAIN Kamran | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
| 5 | LIU Felix | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% |
| 6 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 14% | |
| 7 | JAIN Sarthak | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 44% | 33% |
| 8 | CHU Allan | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
| 9 | LO Jake | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 13% |
| 10 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 5% |
| 11 | LIU Andrew | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
| 12 | SARKAR Anish | 3% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 13 | WANG owen | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 14 | KUO Rylan | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 15 | KNUDSEN Travis | 1% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 16 | PAK Elliot | 5% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 17 | ULINICH Alexander | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 18 | ZAYDMAN David M. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 6% |
| 19 | DOWDELL Riley | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
| 20 | MING Nathan | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 21 | CASTELLY Luke | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 22 | LOWE-THORPE Tyler | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% |
| 22 | SARKAR Agniv | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
| 24 | SINHA Zaan | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 25 | GREEN Jabreel | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
| 26 | PHUKAN Rohin | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 15% | |
| 27 | BRUSKOTTER Reiland | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 28 | GOLDBERG Artie M. | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 29 | CHEN Zhengyang | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 30 | YU Austin | 3% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 31 | WATT Darren | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 32 | BHARGAV Angad | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 33 | WRIGHT Christopher | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 23% | |
| 34 | LEE Bryson | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 35 | HARGROVE Kai | 1% | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 36 | LEVENTAL Mark | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 37 | WONG Kevin | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 38 | PRAKASH Hari | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 39 | GUPTA Karan | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 40 | ZHANG Nathan | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 41 | RAJ Shrey | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | BURLING Trenor | - | 7% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 43 | LOMIO Nicholas A. | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 44 | WONG Ethan | 47% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 45 | CHEN Bailey | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 46 | LIANG Eric | 20% | 50% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 47 | AHMED Saheer | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | |
| 48 | LOFTUS Luca | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 49 | GU Aidan | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 50 | YUEN Nathan | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | SCHNOLL Eli | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | |
| 52 | BHATT Arjun | 4% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 53 | TONG Samuel | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 54 | BARNETT Devin | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | KIM Sullivan | 1% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 56 | CHAKRAVARTHY Arjun | 52% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 57 | NG Biwon | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 58 | MILSTEIN Nikolas | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 59 | LAU Christian | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | RICHARD silas | 55% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.