RIMAC Arena @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
| 2 | SINGHA Orion | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% |
| 3 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 3 | ZHENG Haoran | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% | |
| 5 | SARKAR agniv | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 6 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% |
| 7 | GAO Chaney C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 13% | |
| 8 | WANG DEVON | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 33% |
| 9 | HIGGINS Branford | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% | |
| 10 | JIN daniel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% | |
| 11 | FU Leon | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 9% | |
| 12 | WATT Darren | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
| 13 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 14 | WRIGHT Christopher | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 6% | |
| 15 | YAO Derek (Shunyu) | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 16 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 17 | SARKAR Anish | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
| 18 | DRIBIN Ezra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 9% |
| 19 | SCHROEDER Dylan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 20 | KHANNA Nikhil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% |
| 21 | PHUKAN Rohin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% | |
| 22 | DOWDELL Riley | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 23 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 24 | PARK Augustine | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 25 | WANG owen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 26 | LO Jake | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 9% | |
| 27 | LEE Chun Po | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 28 | CHEN Zhengyang | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 29 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% | |
| 29 | ANDERSON Kai | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 31 | MCDONALD Ethan | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 32 | MENDOZA Zander | 100% | 67% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 34 | GALLO James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
| 35 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 14% | |
| 36 | DE LA TORRE PEREZ Jesus Adiel | 100% | 77% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | ZHANG Alec | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
| 38 | PRAKASH Hari | 100% | 96% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 39 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
| 40 | EVERS Gabriel | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
| 41 | LIU Yikun | 100% | 66% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 42 | LIU Noah | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 43 | LOFTUS Luca | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | CHEN Bailey | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 45 | GAO Zachary | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 46 | JU Hanul | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | YU Austin | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 48 | BRUSKOTTER Reiland | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
| 49 | GUPTA Karan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 2% | |
| 50 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 51 | BURLING Trenor | 100% | 96% | 71% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 52 | PAK Elliot | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 53 | DONAHUE Lake | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 54 | POSSON Luke | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 55 | CHEN Josh | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 56 | ERLIKHMAN Adrian | 100% | 92% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 57 | OBERDERFER Vladimir | 100% | 90% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 58 | MIAO Kunqi | 100% | 85% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 59 | KIM Justin | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.