RIMAC Arena @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JEON Alexander E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
| 2 | MOSES Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% | |
| 3 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 3 | SARKAR agniv | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% | |
| 5 | JAIN Sarthak | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% | |
| 6 | MATTIS George | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 16% | |
| 7 | MENDOZA Zachari | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 8 | JIN daniel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | |
| 9 | KIM Sterling S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 10 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
| 11 | WONG Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 12 | SINGHA Orion | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
| 13 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 2% |
| 14 | KIM Benjamin I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
| 15 | GALLO James | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
| 16 | LEE Chun Po | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 17 | ZHU Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 18 | ZHENG Haoran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 19% |
| 19 | SHARMA Sanil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 20 | KHANNA Nikhil | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
| 21 | BRUSKOTTER Reiland | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | |
| 22 | WANG DEVON | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
| 23 | MCMANUS Farran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 14% |
| 24 | HUSSAIN Kamran | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 25 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 26 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
| 27 | HIGGINS Branford | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
| 28 | STCLAIR Jake | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 29 | SARKAR Anish | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 30 | DOWDELL Riley | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 31 | PHUKAN Rohin | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 32 | WATT Darren | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 33 | ZHANG Alec | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 34 | LO Jake | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 34% | 7% |
| 35 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 36 | YU Austin | 100% | 87% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | AHMED saheer | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
| 38 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 6% |
| 39 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 40 | GAO Chaney C. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
| 41 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 42 | MIAO Kunqi | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | WRIGHT Christopher | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 44 | USHER Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 9% |
| 45 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | 100% | 66% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 46 | LOGUE Ethan D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% |
| 47 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 48 | DRIBIN Ezra | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 49 | CHEN Bailey | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 50 | WANG owen | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 51 | PAK Elliot | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 52 | MCDONALD Ethan | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 53 | WESTON Tom | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 54 | MENDOZA Zander | 100% | 76% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 55 | LIU Yikun | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 56 | NALBANDIAN VAHAN P. | 100% | 66% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | FU Leon | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 58 | GAO Zachary | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 59 | LOFTUS Luca | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | QUITORIANO Matthew | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 61 | BURLING Trenor | 100% | 82% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | LOMIO Nicholas A. | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 63 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 100% | 99% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 64 | PRAKASH Hari | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | ANDERSON Kai | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 66 | CHOI San | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 67 | ELANGO SriVaaikuntesh | 100% | 65% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 68 | LIU Noah | 100% | 81% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.