ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WU Joseph | D V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 2 | BEZRODNOV Alexander | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 3 | AGAON Shawn | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | BHATNAGAR Ayan | V V V V D D | V V V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 5 | YAVOROVSKIY Joshua I. | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 6 | WIECHMANN Colin | V D V D V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 7 | WU Jonathan | V V D D V D | V V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 8 | AGAON Ethan | D V D D D V | V V V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 9 | WU Jason | V D V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 10 | RICHARD Owen | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 11 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 12 | BEZRODNOV Michael | D V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 13 | HE Lawrence | V D D V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 14 | KOKENGE Reid | V D D V V | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 15 | ARAVIND Athreya | D D V V D V | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 16 | NGUYEN Damien | V V D D D V | V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 17 | KNOX James | V V V V V V | D | 3.6 | 6 | +2.4 |
| 18 | BORODITSKY Ethan | V D V V V V | D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 19 | COLLYMORE Spencer T. | V V V D V V | D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 20 | FUSSMAN Yuval | D V V V V V | D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 21 | ROLLO Emmett H. | D V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 22 | CHOI Aleksey | V D V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 23 | PAHLAVI Kamran | D V V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 24 | PARK Frederick | V D D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 25 | SONG Troy | V V V V D D | D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
| 26 | KIM Byung | V V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 27 | TUMIBAY Noah C. | V D V D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 28 | KATS Dylan G. | V V D V D D | V D | 4.9 | 3 | -1.9 |
| 29 | MISHIMA Torata | V V D V D D | V D | 4.8 | 3 | -1.8 |
| 30 | MAHESH Tarun | V D V D V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 31 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | V D D D V D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 32 | VODOVOZOV Denis | D D D D D V | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 33 | LONGSTREET Jeffrey | V V V D D V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 34 | KUMAR Aidan | V D D V V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 35 | GONG Haixiang | V V D D V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 36 | ZHANG William | D V D V D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 37 | DACKO Alexander V. | D V D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 38 | SERAFIN Ben | V D D D D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 39 | STABB Xuan | D D V V D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 40 | LIGOS Alex M. | D D V V D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 41 | DURKIN Tristan E. | D V D V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 42 | WANG Max S | D V D V D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 43 | PAN Tristan | D D V D V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 44 | PANDALAI Aryan | D V V D D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 45 | ZHAO Jordan | V D D D D V | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 | |
| 46 | CHEN Jun Ho | D D D D D V | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 47 | ZHANG Zixian (Shawn) | D D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 48 | HU Robert J. | D D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 48 | XIE Brandon | D D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 50 | SARIDAKIS Ioannis Thanos | D D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 51 | ZHANG Ethan | D D D V D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 52 | REDDY Arya | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 53 | ZOU Xianyang | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 54 | HU Anton | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 55 | ZIAEE Armin | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.