Ontario Convention Center - Hall A & B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | 13% | < 1% | |
2 | WRIGHT Christopher | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% | |
3 | STRAUSS Luke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
3 | SINGHA Orion | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
5 | ULINICH Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
6 | ZHENG Haoran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
7 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
8 | KIM Dohyun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | |
9 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 60% | 15% |
10 | PARK Elliot | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 18% |
11 | MULCAHY Olaf | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
12 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
13 | SCHROEDER Dylan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
14 | ZHANG Nathan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
15 | PAK Elliot | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
16 | HIGGINS Branford | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 47% | 5% | |
17 | GAO Chaney C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
17 | FU Leon | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
19 | CHEN Bailey | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 2% |
20 | JONES Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
21 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 27% |
22 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - |
23 | JIN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% |
24 | KIM Ian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
25 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 24% | |
26 | SHA Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% |
27 | FANG Hanning | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
28 | LI Patrick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
29 | HE Zhiheng | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 51% | 11% |
30 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
31 | LEE Chun Po | 100% | 98% | 82% | 42% | 9% | - | |
32 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% |
33 | WANG DEVON | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 41% |
34 | MIAO KUNQI | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - | |
35 | TORRES Nicolas | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% | |
36 | KOPPE Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
37 | DONAHUE Lake | 100% | 99% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - |
38 | PEÑA Ethan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
39 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
40 | LEE Inwoo | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
41 | YAO Derek (Shunyu) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 27% | 4% |
42 | WANG owen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
43 | QUITORIANO Matthew | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
44 | MCADOO Declan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
45 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 4% |
46 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 11% |
46 | JACKEL Dylan | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
48 | LU Ivan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 18% |
49 | ZI QIN Shang | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% |
50 | KIM Jayden | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
51 | EVERS Gabriel | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
52 | NG Biwon | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
53 | FERRIERE Joshua | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
54 | CHOI Kaiden I. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
55 | REID James | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
56 | LIU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% |
57 | LIU Yikun | 100% | 89% | 54% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
58 | WARD Edward | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
59 | LEE Bryson | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
60 | HINTON Evan | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 6% | - | - |
61 | PHUKAN Rohin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% | |
62 | BHATT Arjun | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
63 | FERDOWSIAN Samuel A | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
64 | LEE JiYuen | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
65 | LOFTUS Luca | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
66 | KIM Teddy | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
67 | JAIN Samyak | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
68 | DAO Alexander | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | |
69 | LIU Noah | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | |
70 | PRAKASH Hari | 100% | 96% | 67% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
71 | KENT V David | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
71 | LIU Yueri | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
73 | FAN Joshua | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
74 | CHAKRAVARTHY Arjun | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
75 | MAJAM Brandon Audie | 100% | 92% | 50% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
76 | YU Austin | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
77 | SHOUSHA Yassin | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
78 | CHUNG Ethan Sheng Xuan | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
79 | CHOI Zachary | 100% | 90% | 49% | 13% | 1% | - | |
80 | NUGENT Jack | 100% | 77% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
81 | SHEN Jiayi | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
82 | CLAES Lucas | 100% | 73% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
83 | DENISON Declan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
84 | LI Yunji | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
85 | LI zerong | 100% | 92% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
86 | GOROZA Eric | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
87 | RAHMAN Yousef | 100% | 71% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
88 | ANDERSON Kai | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
89 | BAKKEN Archer | 100% | 89% | 52% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
90 | MILEY Walker | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
91 | BARRERA Nathanael | 100% | 75% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
92 | ARMITAGE Liam | 100% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
93 | KIM Justin | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
94 | DU Peter | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
95 | DACHELET Sawyer | 100% | 96% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.