Anaheim , CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WEI Zikun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 2 | ZHU Wilson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 3 | JEON Alexander E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% |
| 3 | JEONG Connor | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% |
| 5 | NORBUTAS Jackson S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
| 6 | MCDERMOTT Brian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
| 7 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
| 8 | CAI Kevin P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 15% | |
| 9 | MOOSEKIAN Stafford | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
| 10 | SHIN Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 14% |
| 11 | MUN Michael K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 6% |
| 12 | IYOKI Kent | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% |
| 13 | LI Brian X | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 4% |
| 14 | MIELE Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% |
| 15 | LIN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 16 | LIANG Aaron | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | LEE Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% |
| 18 | CHU Anthony | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 19 | CANDELA Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
| 20 | LEE Matthew C. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 21 | ZAFFT Maximo S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
| 22 | MAENG Jake W. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | DAO Matthew M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
| 24 | LIU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
| 25 | CHAVARIN Gustavos L. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 26 | IVE Isaac L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 10% |
| 27 | LUCERO-OLSON Aydin | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 28 | ROBINSON Riley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% |
| 29 | YULE Alexander L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 30 | KIM PAUL | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 31 | VAN EIKEMA HOMMES Neil B. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 32 | LOUIE Jason | 100% | 61% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 33 | LEHR William D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
| 34 | LEI Jacob | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 8% | |
| 35 | YUMIACO Nolan C. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 36 | MOSES Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 9% |
| 37 | JIN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 38 | SHUR Yakov C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 39 | LEE Alexander G. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% | |
| 40 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 41 | CHUNG Thomas | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 42 | LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 43 | RHYU Kozmo | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 44 | MENDOZA Zachari | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 45 | INSLER Ethan C. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 46 | SOLTER Kai | 100% | 85% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | MOHEBI Saam | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 47 | KAGAN Spencer E. | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | ZHU Max | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 50 | WELLS Tommy R. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 50 | DE JONG Thijmen J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 52 | ZIEBART Jeremy J. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 53 | KIM Benjamin I. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 54 | SHOURIE Jai | 100% | 89% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 55 | DESOUZA Hansel S. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 56 | SINGHA Orion | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 57 | SCRIBNER Aidan C. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 58 | WOMACH Tristan | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 59 | KAJI Ty | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 60 | GARRETT Samuel | 100% | 96% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 61 | DIAS-LALCACA Kieran P. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 62 | RAJPAL Sartaj S. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | |
| 64 | DUONG Enoch | 100% | 96% | 72% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 65 | HU Matthew | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 66 | BARRY Dominick | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 67 | WEAVER Neil | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 68 | SOOHOO Jackson F. | 100% | 86% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 69 | KOPPE Benjamin | 100% | 68% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 70 | ARABACI Jack A. | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 71 | LOWE-THORPE Tyler | 100% | 70% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 72 | COLLINS Damase | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 73 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 10% |
| 74 | STENNIS Brendan | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 75 | KOPPE Alexander | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 76 | YOUNG Jr Colby | 100% | 66% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 77 | CHU Allan | 100% | 95% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 78 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | 100% | 87% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 79 | KIM Sterling S. | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | BORLAND Isaac | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 81 | RAKHIMI Marat T. | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 82 | LIOZNYANSKY Simon | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 83 | MILEY Nick N. | 100% | 86% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.