Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TOWNSEND Avery S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% |
2 | LEE Timothy S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
3 | KIM Juni C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% |
3 | RONG Yao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% |
5 | KANG Michael H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 20% |
6 | MCDERMOTT Brian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 25% | |
7 | MORSE Tyler | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 26% | 3% |
8 | SHENG Patrick Y. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 49% | 19% | 3% |
9 | ZHANG YuJian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 21% |
10 | SHINE Peter C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
11 | SHI Edric | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
12 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% |
13 | KASTENBERG Leo M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | 6% | - |
14 | PAVLENISHVILI David G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
15 | LEE Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 26% |
16 | FELDMAN Jaemin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
17 | KOKENGE Clark | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
18 | DIXON Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% |
19 | PARK Ian C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
20 | PLECHAVICIUS Daniel | 100% | 93% | 67% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
21 | PAK Charles | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 17% | |
22 | DYER Ian E. | 100% | 99% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
23 | KREATSOULAS Christos | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
24 | BORATGIS Christopher J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 21% |
25 | YOO David D. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
26 | CHI Yingxu | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 41% | 14% | 2% |
27 | SMITH Nicholas S. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 28% | 5% | - |
28 | BAGHA Armin | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% | |
29 | GUI Runlin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
30 | LIU Kyle | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
31 | RHYU Kozmo | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
32 | DING Phillip C. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
33 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
34 | DIAS-LALCACA Kieran P. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
35 | VAYSBUKH Konstantin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 18% |
36 | DIB Aaniss | 100% | 95% | 68% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
37 | MAAS Sean H. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
38 | SHAH Maximilian A. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
40 | GASIOROWSKI Devin G. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
40 | POZOVSKIY Mitchell R. | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
42 | LONCAR Luka E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
43 | DISIMONE David Z. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
44 | TONG Chihao | 100% | 93% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
45 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 100% | 90% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
46 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
46 | RAWSON Nicholas | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
48 | SOOMRO Adam A. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
49 | GILLIS George | 100% | 84% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - |
50 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - |
51 | CHEN Junle R. | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
52 | HUANG Zijin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 21% |
53 | KROPP Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 43% | 10% |
54 | MISHIMA Torata | 100% | 97% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
55 | LIU Jack | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
56 | JEYOON Ryan S. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
57 | DIXON Thomas | 100% | 94% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | |
58 | KIM William M. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
59 | SIDDIQUI Humza K. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 28% | 5% | - |
60 | KOLKER Gregory A. | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
61 | WANG Eric S | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
62 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
63 | HERMANSON David B. | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
64 | WIEDERHORN Ethan | 100% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
65 | BANKULLA Nihal R. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
66 | SCOTT David | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
67 | SRITHARAN Sanjaya A. | 100% | 93% | 62% | 21% | 3% | - | |
68 | WU Jason | 100% | 84% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
69 | MACARTY Jordan T. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 2% |
70 | GULLO Kenji Y. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
70 | LI Brian | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
72 | YAN Phillip | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
73 | WU Byron | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
74 | PENEIRAS Evan | 100% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
75 | MUN Chur-Yong | 100% | 75% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
76 | LIU Yichen | 100% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.